From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Future tracing/instrumentation directions
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 14:15:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100520121458.GF5309@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005201256420.3368@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:07:57PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:31:31AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > - [ While it's still a long way off, if this trend continues
> > > we eventually might even be able to get rid of the
> > > /debug/tracing/ temporary debug API and get rid of
> > > the ugly in-kernel pretty-printing bits. This is
> > > good: it may make Andrew very happy for a change ;-)
> > >
> > > The main detail here to be careful of is that lots of
> > > people are fond of the simplicity of the
> > > /debug/tracing/ debug UI, so when we replace it we
> > > want to do it by keeping that simple workflow (or
> > > best by making it even simpler). I have a few ideas
> > > how to do this.
> >
> > How? We can emulate the /debug/tracing result with something
> > like perf trace, still that won't replace the immediate
> > availability of the result of any trace, which makes it
> > valuable for any simplest workflows.
>
> I'm a bit torn about this. I really like the availability of the ascii
> interface, but if we can come up with a very basic trace binary tool
> which can be built for deep embedded w/o requiring the world and some
> more libs to be available, then I might give up my resistance. Ideally
> it should be done so it can be easily integrated into busybox.
>
> I don't care whether I do
>
> echo 1 >/debug/..../XXX/enable
> cat /debug/tracing/trace
>
> or
>
> perfmini trace enable XXX
> perfmini trace dump
>
> as long as the tool is built in a way that it does not need updates
> when we add trace points or other functionality to the kernel.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
You have a (much) deeper experience than me about the embedded world.
And this was the area I worried most about, especially because dropping
the preformatted output means we add a random dependency.
If you think people can be fine a minimal tool that does this, then ok,
as far as the given tool is really easy to get and to build.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-20 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-19 17:51 [RFC] Unified Ring Buffer (Next Generation) Steven Rostedt
2010-05-19 18:10 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-19 18:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-19 19:25 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-19 19:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-19 18:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-20 6:41 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-20 13:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-19 19:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-20 9:31 ` [RFD] Future tracing/instrumentation directions Ingo Molnar
2010-05-20 10:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-20 11:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-20 11:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-20 11:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-20 12:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-05-20 12:19 ` Theodore Tso
2010-05-20 11:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-20 13:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-20 14:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-20 15:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-20 20:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-21 17:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-24 20:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-05-21 9:24 ` Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100520121458.GF5309@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox