From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, ui: Eliminate stack-smashing protection compiler complain
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:49:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101107214900.GE11134@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101106084724.GA5956@lenovo>
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:47:24AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> The gcc complains on Yes, No being allocated from stack space. Make
> them conts to feel compiler happy.
>
> | CC util/ui/util.o
> | cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> | util/ui/util.c: In function ‘ui__dialog_yesno’:
> | util/ui/util.c:108: error: not protecting function: no buffer at least 8 bytes long
> | make: *** [util/ui/util.o] Error 1
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> CC: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
I hope we can finally queue this one fix, the warning is there
for a while now, and this patch looks quite sensible :)
>
> Since it seems only me who has such error I presume ssp-buffer-size=8 set
> for mine local version of gcc (gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4))
>
> tools/perf/util/ui/util.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.git/tools/perf/util/ui/util.c
> =====================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/tools/perf/util/ui/util.c
> +++ linux-2.6.git/tools/perf/util/ui/util.c
> @@ -104,9 +104,10 @@ out_destroy_form:
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static const char yes[] = "Yes", no[] = "No";
> bool ui__dialog_yesno(const char *msg)
> {
> /* newtWinChoice should really be accepting const char pointers... */
> - char yes[] = "Yes", no[] = "No";
> - return newtWinChoice(NULL, yes, no, (char *)msg) == 1;
> + return newtWinChoice(NULL, (char *)yes, (char *)no, (char *)msg) == 1;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-07 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-06 8:47 [PATCH] perf, ui: Eliminate stack-smashing protection compiler complain Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-07 21:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-11-07 21:51 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101107214900.GE11134@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox