From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:57:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110107125722.GA23185@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D26F3AE020000780002AF5D@vpn.id2.novell.com>
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> >>> On 07.01.11 at 10:58, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> >> However, the problem my patch addresses has been long standing
> >> (I noted it with our .32 based kernel, but according to my looking at
> >> the code it would go back to at least .27), so I'd like to ask for it to
> >> be merged independently (and I should probably have copied stable
> >> too), unless (quite unlikely) Tejun's merge is intended to also be
> >> applied to stable kernels.
> >>
> >
> > I don't think this should be targeted to -stable since it's not a bugfix;
> > this is adding a feature that allows you to disable acpi parsing of the
> > SRAT on i386.
>
> How is this not a bug fix if it allows a system to boot that previously
> didn't?
btw., that's an absolutely key piece of information that REALLY should have been
included in the changelog of the first patch. It is more important than all of the
changelog.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-07 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-06 17:02 [PATCH] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling Jan Beulich
2011-01-06 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-07 7:51 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 9:58 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-07 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 12:57 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-01-07 13:32 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 14:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-07 14:26 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 15:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-07 19:55 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-10 8:14 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 20:37 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-07 20:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-07 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-07 20:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-07 20:46 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110107125722.GA23185@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox