From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:37:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110107203750.GD7355@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D26D3FD020000780002AED9@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Hello, Jan.
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 07:51:09AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > I like the idea in general, but I think it may collide with Tejun's NUMA
> > unification patchset for x86, which I assume will another revision once
> > the merge window for .38 closes? Or maybe he'd like to merge your patch
> > with his series and push it as one?
>
> I would assume that if unification is done, then the command line
> option would become common too. Tejun?
The unification isn't full and the parameter handling hasn't been
moved yet, so yeah, either your patch can go in first and I can
refresh my series on top of it or vice-versa.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-07 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-06 17:02 [PATCH] x86: unify "numa=" command line option handling Jan Beulich
2011-01-06 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-07 7:51 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 9:58 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-07 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 12:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-07 13:32 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 14:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-07 14:26 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 15:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-07 19:55 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-10 8:14 ` Jan Beulich
2011-01-07 20:37 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-01-07 20:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-07 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-07 20:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-07 20:46 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110107203750.GD7355@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox