* Undefined TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi: move rx handlers code to iwl-rx.c) [not found] ` <AANLkTimNjxguAFcRr-mJr-pPMkf6zTxzm4k7oV+6zngG@mail.gmail.com> @ 2011-03-07 8:12 ` Stanislaw Gruszka 2011-03-07 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Stanislaw Gruszka @ 2011-03-07 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Halperin, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar Cc: Guy, Wey-Yi, Intel Linux Wireless, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 03:47:55PM -0800, Daniel Halperin wrote: > This fixes the error for me. Code compile on 64 bits, but fail on 32, hmm ... > Dan > > index 7dc2d39..e3ba4d5 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > #include <linux/etherdevice.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <net/mac80211.h> > +#include <linux/sched.h> > #include <asm/unaligned.h> > #include "iwl-eeprom.h" > #include "iwl-dev.h" This fixes the problem, I will post signed-off patch to John in a second. But perhaps we need a more generic fix in wait.h for the future. Maybe we should decouple definitions of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and friends from sched.h into separate header and include that header in wait.h as well? Stanislaw > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Guy, Wey-Yi <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Stanislaw, > > > > On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 08:51 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > >> Put generic rx_handlers (except iwlagn_rx_reply_compressed_ba) to > >> iwl-rx.c . Make functions static and change prefix from iwlagn_ to > >> iwl_ . Beautify iwl_setup_rx_handlers and do some other minor coding > >> style changes. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> > >> --- > > this patch break the compiling > > > > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c:778:17: error: undefined > > identifier 'TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE' > > CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.o > > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c: In function > > ‘iwl_rx_card_state_notif’: > > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c:778: error: ‘TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE’ > > undeclared (first use in this function) > > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c:778: error: (Each undeclared > > identifier is reported only once > > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c:778: error: for each function it > > appears in.) > > make[1]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.o] Error 1 > > make: *** [_module_drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi] Error 2 > > > > > > Thanks > > Wey > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Undefined TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi: move rx handlers code to iwl-rx.c) 2011-03-07 8:12 ` Undefined TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi: move rx handlers code to iwl-rx.c) Stanislaw Gruszka @ 2011-03-07 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-03-07 13:12 ` Stanislaw Gruszka 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2011-03-07 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: Daniel Halperin, Ingo Molnar, Guy, Wey-Yi, Intel Linux Wireless, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 09:12 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > But perhaps we need a more generic fix in wait.h for the future. Maybe > we should decouple definitions of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and friends from > sched.h into separate header and include that header in wait.h as > well? No! That only makes the mess worse, the only sane option is to fix things so that wait.h can include sched.h and that is non-trivial. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Undefined TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi: move rx handlers code to iwl-rx.c) 2011-03-07 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra @ 2011-03-07 13:12 ` Stanislaw Gruszka 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Stanislaw Gruszka @ 2011-03-07 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Daniel Halperin, Ingo Molnar, Guy, Wey-Yi, Intel Linux Wireless, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:20:02AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 09:12 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > > > But perhaps we need a more generic fix in wait.h for the future. Maybe > > we should decouple definitions of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and friends from > > sched.h into separate header and include that header in wait.h as > > well? > > No! That only makes the mess worse, the only sane option is to fix > things so that wait.h can include sched.h and that is non-trivial. I was not aware of recent discussion http://marc.info/?t=129829886000004&r=1&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-07 13:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1299257511-5241-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1299447258.5082.164.camel@wwguy-huron>
[not found] ` <AANLkTimNjxguAFcRr-mJr-pPMkf6zTxzm4k7oV+6zngG@mail.gmail.com>
2011-03-07 8:12 ` Undefined TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi: move rx handlers code to iwl-rx.c) Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-03-07 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-07 13:12 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox