From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: nigel@tuxonice.net
Cc: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / Hibernate: Add sysfs knob to control size of memory for drivers
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 01:22:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105170122.04402.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD19879.5020606@tuxonice.net>
On Monday, May 16, 2011, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 15/05/11 19:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > In fact, if drivers allocated their memory from suspend/hibernate notifiers,
> > that would be practically equivalent to setting reserved_size to the total
> > amount of memory reserved by the drivers. However, it may be difficult
> > for drivers to predict how much memory they will need at the time the
> > notifiers are called (they are called before freezing user space).
> >
> > Thus I'm considering a change that will cause device drivers' ->prepare()
> > callbacks to be executed before the preallocation of memory takes place.
> > In that case the drivers may allocate memory from their ->prepare()
> > callbacks _after_ user space has been frozen and that will make more
> > sense overall.
> >
> > For now, however, I think that exposing reserved_size is the right choice.
>
> Sorry for not commenting earlier - too busy with Drupal development and
> only came across this thread by chance (yes, I'm still subscribed to the
> PM list, but haven't been reading it. Hibernation isn't high on my list
> of priorities at the moment because TOI is feature complete and stable.
> I know I'm supposed to be sending you patches, but other things have
> been taking the time that would be used for that).
>
> Anyway...
>
> This sounds to me like a great development. As far as TuxOnIce goes,
> we've had a knob for ages that has allowed the user to specify an amount
> of memory to be kept aside for driver allocations, and we calculate and
> report how much they used in the debugging info sysfs entry. Because
> TuxOnIce works differently to [u]swsusp, this is the only source of
> potential out-of-memory related failures, and the measures just
> mentioned made things much more reliable.
>
> If things went in the direction you're suggesting here, they'd get
> better again. I'm all in favour!
Thanks Nigel!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-16 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-09 22:59 [RFC][PATCH] PM / Hibernate: Add sysfs knob to control size of memory for drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-14 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-15 8:51 ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-05-15 9:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-15 9:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-16 21:34 ` Nigel Cunningham
2011-05-16 23:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-05-18 17:27 ` Pavel Machek
2011-05-18 18:09 ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-05-18 18:36 ` Pavel Machek
2011-05-18 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201105170122.04402.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=nigel@tuxonice.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox