public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / Hibernate: Add sysfs knob to control size of memory for drivers
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:36:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110518183638.GA8887@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201105182009.55813.Martin@lichtvoll.de>

Hi!

> > > OK, there are no comments, so my understanding is that everyone is
> > > fine with this patch and I can add it to my linux-next branch.
> > 
> > Actually no, I don't like it. Yes, knob might be useful for debugging,
> > but having it as part of official kernel interface...
> 
> Well I and people with similar setups it is actually quite useful. It 
> makes the difference between does hibernate *every time* versus does not 
> hibernate sometimes. And I don't see why it can't go again, when the issue 
> is taken care of elsewise in the future. I think that autotuning / drivers 
> allocating their memory via whatnot is better, but until such a mechanism 
> is agreed, developed and included in official kernel I do think that this 
> knob does help.

Yes, autotuning would be better, and yes, knob is useful for you now.

I'd say the knob is for debugging and should go to debugfs somewhere.

> I think missing is some documentation so that the advanced user can figure 
> out this knob.

...so we can easily delete the knob when it is no longer neccessary.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-18 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-09 22:59 [RFC][PATCH] PM / Hibernate: Add sysfs knob to control size of memory for drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-14 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-15  8:51   ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-05-15  9:36     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-15  9:51       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-16 21:34       ` Nigel Cunningham
2011-05-16 23:22         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-18 17:27   ` Pavel Machek
2011-05-18 18:09     ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-05-18 18:36       ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2011-05-18 20:23         ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110518183638.GA8887@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox