From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: allow groups preemption for sync-noidle workloads
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:21:59 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110623162159.3192.87699.stgit@localhost6> (raw)
commit v2.6.32-102-g8682e1f "blkio: Provide some isolation between groups" break
fast switching between task and journal-thread for very common write-fsync workload.
cfq wait idle slice at each cfqq switch, if this task is from non-root blkio cgroup.
This patch move idling sync-noidle preempting check little bit upwards and update
new service_tree->count check for case with two different groups.
I do not quite understand what means these check for new_cfqq, but now it even works.
Without patch I got 49 iops and with this patch 798, for this trivial fio script:
[write-fsync]
cgroup=test
cgroup_weight=1000
rw=write
fsync=1
size=100m
runtime=10s
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 3c7b537..c71533e 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -3318,19 +3318,19 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
if (rq_is_sync(rq) && !cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq))
return true;
- if (new_cfqq->cfqg != cfqq->cfqg)
- return false;
-
- if (cfq_slice_used(cfqq))
- return true;
-
/* Allow preemption only if we are idling on sync-noidle tree */
if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
cfqq_type(new_cfqq) == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
- new_cfqq->service_tree->count == 2 &&
+ new_cfqq->service_tree->count == 1+(new_cfqq->cfqg == cfqq->cfqg) &&
RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&cfqq->sort_list))
return true;
+ if (new_cfqq->cfqg != cfqq->cfqg)
+ return false;
+
+ if (cfq_slice_used(cfqq))
+ return true;
+
/*
* So both queues are sync. Let the new request get disk time if
* it's a metadata request and the current queue is doing regular IO.
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-23 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-23 16:21 Konstantin Khlebnikov [this message]
2011-06-23 17:26 ` [PATCH] cfq-iosched: allow groups preemption for sync-noidle workloads Vivek Goyal
2011-06-23 18:38 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-06-23 18:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-23 20:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-24 10:29 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110623162159.3192.87699.stgit@localhost6 \
--to=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox