From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Wolfram Sang" <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
thierry.nolf.barco@gmail.com,
"Huang Shijie" <b32955@freescale.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Lothar Waßmann" <LW@karo-electronics.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new helper to define common struct resource constructs
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:29:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201107121529.17611.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1QgHeh-0004k8-2m@octopus.hi.pengutronix.de>
On Monday 11 July 2011, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> resource definitions that just define start, end and flags = IORESOURCE_MEM
> or IORESOURCE_IRQ (with start=end) are quite common. So introduce a shortcut
> for them. Also make available a macro to specify named resources of both
> types which are less common.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
What do others think, is this worthwhile?
Should we also define macros for IORESOURCE_IO and IORESOURCE_DMA?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-12 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <14C4E31473AF7E4B98176CB73615181C19FBD3@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net>
[not found] ` <201107072304.05626.arnd@arndb.de>
[not found] ` <E1QgHeh-0004k8-2m@octopus.hi.pengutronix.de>
2011-07-11 15:03 ` [PATCH] ARM: mxc: use new helpers to define common struct resource entries Uwe Kleine-König
2011-07-12 13:29 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-07-12 17:13 ` [PATCH] new helper to define common struct resource constructs H Hartley Sweeten
2011-07-12 18:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Uwe Kleine-König
2011-07-13 21:18 ` [PATCH] " Andrew Morton
2011-07-13 21:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-13 22:15 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-07-14 8:11 ` [PATCH v3] " Uwe Kleine-König
2011-07-14 11:34 ` Lothar Waßmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201107121529.17611.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=LW@karo-electronics.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=b32955@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=thierry.nolf.barco@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox