[PATCH] mfd: Acknowlege all WM831x IRQs before we handle them

[PATCH] mfd: Acknowlege all WM831x IRQs before we handle them

[Mark Brown]

Ensure that we never have a window where we've handled an interrupt (and
therefore need to be notified of new events) but haven't yet told the
interrupt controller that this is the case (so any new events will be
discarded).

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/wm831x-irq.c |   30 +++++++++++++-----------------
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm831x-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/wm831x-irq.c
index 6c3408c..ada1835 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/wm831x-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/wm831x-irq.c
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static irqreturn_t wm831x_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
 {
 	struct wm831x *wm831x = data;
 	unsigned int i;
-	int primary;
+	int primary, status_addr;
 	int status_regs[WM831X_NUM_IRQ_REGS] = { 0 };
 	int read[WM831X_NUM_IRQ_REGS] = { 0 };
 	int *status;
@@ -484,8 +484,9 @@ static irqreturn_t wm831x_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
 		/* Hopefully there should only be one register to read
 		 * each time otherwise we ought to do a block read. */
 		if (!read[offset]) {
-			*status = wm831x_reg_read(wm831x,
-				     irq_data_to_status_reg(&wm831x_irqs[i]));
+			status_addr = irq_data_to_status_reg(&wm831x_irqs[i]);
+
+			*status = wm831x_reg_read(wm831x, status_addr);
 			if (*status < 0) {
 				dev_err(wm831x->dev,
 					"Failed to read IRQ status: %d\n",
@@ -494,26 +495,21 @@ static irqreturn_t wm831x_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
 			}
 
 			read[offset] = 1;
+
+			/* Ignore any bits that we don't think are masked */
+			*status &= ~wm831x->irq_masks_cur[offset];
+
+			/* Acknowledge now so we don't miss
+			 * notifications while we handle.
+			 */
+			wm831x_reg_write(wm831x, status_addr, *status);
 		}
 
-		/* Report it if it isn't masked, or forget the status. */
-		if ((*status & ~wm831x->irq_masks_cur[offset])
-		    & wm831x_irqs[i].mask)
+		if (*status & wm831x_irqs[i].mask)
 			handle_nested_irq(wm831x->irq_base + i);
-		else
-			*status &= ~wm831x_irqs[i].mask;
 	}
 
 out:
-	/* Touchscreen interrupts are handled specially in the driver */
-	status_regs[0] &= ~(WM831X_TCHDATA_EINT | WM831X_TCHPD_EINT);
-
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(status_regs); i++) {
-		if (status_regs[i])
-			wm831x_reg_write(wm831x, WM831X_INTERRUPT_STATUS_1 + i,
-					 status_regs[i]);
-	}
-
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.5.4

Re: [PATCH] mfd: Acknowlege all WM831x IRQs before we handle them

[Samuel Ortiz]

Hi Mark,

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:05:13PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Ensure that we never have a window where we've handled an interrupt (and
> therefore need to be notified of new events) but haven't yet told the
> interrupt controller that this is the case (so any new events will be
> discarded).
Thanks, patch applied.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/