public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:690 __lock_acquire+0x168/0x164b()
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:09:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111016050920.GB3475@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110151529570.25063@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On (10/15/11 15:32), David Rientjes wrote:
> > > I think this is a problem with lockdep itself, could you try reverting 
> > > f59de8992aa6 ("lockdep: Clear whole lockdep_map on initialization") if 
> > > this reliably happens everytime you reboot (lockdep will only emit this 
> > > once and then will suppress future warnings until the next boot)?
> > > 
> > > I think the new memset() is inadvertently clearing the name for 
> > > double_unlock_balance().
> > 
> > Great,
> > 
> > so I'm not the only one seeing the above:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131468805610527
> > 
> > Due to it being very hard to reproduce, we dismissed it then as a
> > possible hw corruption.
> > 
> > But yeah, it looks like I have triggered it on -rc9 too, just the
> > other day. Oh, and I see -rc6 and -rc8 warnings in the logs too. Ok,
> > correction, not that hard to trigger.
> > 
> 
> Could you try to revert f59de8992aa6 ("lockdep: Clear whole lockdep_map on 
> initialization") with this patch and see if it helps?  Thanks.


Sure, I'd love to and will do, it's just I'm not sure I can easily reproduce it.



> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
> --- a/kernel/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
> @@ -2874,7 +2874,10 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
>  void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
>  		      struct lock_class_key *key, int subclass)
>  {
> -	memset(lock, 0, sizeof(*lock));
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES; i++)
> +		lock->class_cache[i] = NULL;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_STAT
>  	lock->cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-16  5:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-15 20:12 WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:690 __lock_acquire+0x168/0x164b() Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-10-15 21:42 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-15 22:23   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-15 22:32     ` David Rientjes
2011-10-16  5:09       ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2011-10-20 18:39       ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-20 18:53         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-10-20 19:07           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-10-20 21:17             ` David Rientjes
2011-10-20 21:23               ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 21:31                 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-20 21:36                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 23:00                     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-10-21  9:14                       ` David Rientjes
2011-10-21  9:26                         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-10-21  9:45                         ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-03  7:17                           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-11-03  7:27                             ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-03  7:45                               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-11-03  7:53                                 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-04  9:25                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-11-04  9:31                                     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-11-07  4:54                                       ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-07  8:43                                         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-11-04  9:34                                     ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-04  9:51                                       ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111016050920.GB3475@swordfish \
    --to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox