From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:690 __lock_acquire+0x168/0x164b()
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:45:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111021094520.GA9884@zhy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110210212130.12963@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 02:14:34AM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> How does it mask the race condition? Before the memset(), the ->name
> field was never _cleared_ in lockdep_init_map() like it is now, it was
> only stored.
A typcal race condition will like this:
CPU A CPU B
lock_set_subclass(lockA);
lock_set_class(lockA);
lockdep_init_map(lockA);
/* lockA->name is cleared */
memset(lockA);
__lock_acquire(lockA);
/* lockA->class_cache[] is cleared */
register_lock_class(lockA);
look_up_lock_class(lockA);
WARN_ON_ONCE(class->name !=
lock->name);
lock->name = name;
And a untested patch is below:
BTW, now the patch could cure (I guess) the very issue reported
in this thread.
But it don't cover the case which change the key and the relevant
lock_class has existed, I don't think out a way how to fix it yet :)
But the fact is we have no such caller yet, the only call site of
lock_set_subclass() is double_unlock_balance().
Thanks,
Yong
---
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: On-demand initialization for lock_set_class()
Since commit f59de89 [lockdep: Clear whole lockdep_map on initialization],
lockdep_init_map() will clear all the struct. But it will break
lock_set_class()/lock_set_subclass(). A typical race condition
is like below:
CPU A CPU B
lock_set_subclass(lockA);
lock_set_class(lockA);
lockdep_init_map(lockA);
/* lockA->name is cleared */
memset(lockA);
__lock_acquire(lockA);
/* lockA->class_cache[] is cleared */
register_lock_class(lockA);
look_up_lock_class(lockA);
WARN_ON_ONCE(class->name !=
lock->name);
lock->name = name;
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/lockdep.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index 91d67ce..bc7dd1e 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -3160,7 +3160,10 @@ __lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
return print_unlock_inbalance_bug(curr, lock, ip);
found_it:
- lockdep_init_map(lock, name, key, 0);
+ /* only changing lock->name make no sense */
+ WARN_ON(lock->key == key && lock->name != name);
+ if (lock->key != key)
+ lockdep_init_map(lock, name, key, 0);
class = register_lock_class(lock, subclass, 0);
hlock->class_idx = class - lock_classes + 1;
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-21 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-15 20:12 WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:690 __lock_acquire+0x168/0x164b() Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-10-15 21:42 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-15 22:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-15 22:32 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-16 5:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-10-20 18:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-20 18:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-10-20 19:07 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-10-20 21:17 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-20 21:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 21:31 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-20 21:36 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 23:00 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-10-21 9:14 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-21 9:26 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-10-21 9:45 ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2011-11-03 7:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-11-03 7:27 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-03 7:45 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-11-03 7:53 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-04 9:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-11-04 9:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-11-07 4:54 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-07 8:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-11-04 9:34 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-04 9:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111021094520.GA9884@zhy \
--to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox