From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHSET] perf ui: Small preparation on further UI work
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:55:54 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120327135554.GC5195@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203271337290.19635@tux.localdomain>
Em Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:44:42PM +0300, Pekka Enberg escreveu:
> I completely missed the newly added tools/perf/ui directory which doesn't
> make much sense. We definitely ought to consolidate all this code under
> tools/perf/util/ui and gradually move the tui code out of it instead.
>
> [ I would, however, like to make the directory nesting less deep by
> dropping the "util" part from the directory name. But that's a
> completely different topic. ]
Yeah, the tools/perf/util/ should go away at some point, Borislav's
patches are a step in that direction, he is again at it, this time
carving out subsets so that we can go on gradually doing this
separation, see the tools top level Makefile discussion.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-27 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-26 8:51 [RFC PATCHSET] perf ui: Small preparation on further UI work Namhyung Kim
2012-03-26 8:51 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf ui: Make setup_browser() generic Namhyung Kim
2012-03-26 8:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf ui: Drop arg[cv] arguments from perf_gtk_setup_browser() Namhyung Kim
2012-03-26 8:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf ui: Add gtk2 support into setup_browser() Namhyung Kim
2012-03-26 8:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf gtk: Rename functions for consistency Namhyung Kim
2012-03-26 8:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf ui: Change fallback policy of setup_browser() Namhyung Kim
2012-03-26 9:46 ` [RFC PATCHSET] perf ui: Small preparation on further UI work Pekka Enberg
2012-03-26 17:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-03-27 10:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-03-27 13:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2012-03-28 2:14 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-03-28 14:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-03-29 1:03 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120327135554.GC5195@infradead.org \
--to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox