From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] floppy: remove floppy-specific O_EXCL handling
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:22:01 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120515092201.4d00b4f5@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1205142326010.15448@pobox.suse.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3270 bytes --]
On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:38:27 +0200 (CEST) Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > > Because since
> > >
> > > commit e525fd89d380c4a94c0d63913a1dd1a593ed25e7
> > > Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > > Date: Sat Nov 13 11:55:17 2010 +0100
> > >
> > > block: make blkdev_get/put() handle exclusive access
> > >
> > > mount of /dev/fd0 actually causes the fd0 block device be claimed with
> > > _EXCL. Before this commit, you are able to mount /dev/fd0 and then open()
> > > it afterward. After this commit you can't any more, because mounting
> > > /dev/fd0 already passes O_EXCL to floppy_open(), and thus noone else can
> > > open(/dev/fd0) any more.
> > >
> > > My commit brings things back into shape, i.e. you can, equally to other
> > > block devices, both mount it and open() it afterwards.
> >
> > Ah, that makes sense. Maybe it's a good idea to note why the change
> > is necessary in the commit message too?
>
> Makes sense. Please find the updated patch below. Andrew, Jens, are you
> going to pick it up, please?
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> Subject: [PATCH] floppy: remove floppy-specific O_EXCL handling
>
> Block layer now handles O_EXCL in a generic way for block devices.
>
> The semantics is however different for floppy and all other block devices,
> as floppy driver contains its own O_EXCL handling.
>
> The semantics for all-but-floppy bdevs is "there can be at most one O_EXCL
> open of this file", while for floppy bdev the semantics is "if someone has
> the bdev open with O_EXCL, noone else can open it".
>
> There is actual userspace-observable change in behavior because of this
> since commit e525fd89d380c ("block: make blkdev_get/put() handle exclusive
> access") -- on kernels containing this commit, mount of /dev/fd0 causes
> the fd0 block device be claimed with _EXCL, preventing subsequent
> open(/dev/fd0).
>
> Bring things back into shape, i.e. make it possible, analogically to other
> block devices, to mount the floppy and open() it afterwards -- remove the
> floppy-specific handling and let the generic bdev code O_EXCL handling
> take over.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/block/floppy.c | 8 +-------
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/floppy.c b/drivers/block/floppy.c
> index b0b00d7..fe694f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/floppy.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/floppy.c
> @@ -3650,13 +3650,7 @@ static int floppy_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
> set_bit(FD_VERIFY_BIT, &UDRS->flags);
> }
>
> - if (UDRS->fd_ref == -1 || (UDRS->fd_ref && (mode & FMODE_EXCL)))
> - goto out2;
> -
> - if (mode & FMODE_EXCL)
> - UDRS->fd_ref = -1;
> - else
> - UDRS->fd_ref++;
> + UDRS->fd_ref++;
>
> opened_bdev[drive] = bdev;
>
As we not longer set fd_ref to -1, you should also remove:
if (UDRS->fd_ref < 0)
UDRS->fd_ref = 0;
else
from floppy_release(), and the 'out:' section of floppy_open().
With those changes:
Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-14 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-13 9:02 [PATCH] floppy: remove floppy-specific O_EXCL handling Jiri Kosina
2012-05-14 16:25 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-14 16:49 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-14 20:42 ` Jiri Kosina
2012-05-14 21:19 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-14 21:38 ` Jiri Kosina
2012-05-14 23:22 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-05-15 6:15 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120515092201.4d00b4f5@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox