public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: tty_mutex: fix lockdep warning in tty_lock_pair(v1)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 14:47:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120525144713.6946df1e@bob.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337952533.9783.195.camel@laptop>

> Having looked at the source I still don't see how it could possibly
> work,.. So the problem with tty_release() -> tty_ldisc_release() is
> that tty_ldisc_release() does an unlock/lock of tty.

Yes it should do the pair, see the patch I posted restructing it, and
the second one restructing it right.

> However your tty_lock_pair() can still result in tty being subclass 1,
> see your else branch, nested case.
> 
> That said, how is this not a real deadlock? If you rely on tty pointer
> ordering to avoid deadlocks, you always need to lock them in the same
> order. The unlock+lock in ldisc_release violates that.

Which was a bug.

Alan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-25 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-22  1:58 [PATCH] tty: tty_mutex: fix lockdep warning in tty_lock_pair(v1) Ming Lei
2012-05-23  6:01 ` Ming Lei
2012-05-25 13:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-25 13:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-25 13:47     ` Alan Cox [this message]
2012-05-25 13:52       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-25 14:01         ` Alan Cox
2012-05-25 14:08           ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120525144713.6946df1e@bob.linux.org.uk \
    --to=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox