From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: tty_mutex: fix lockdep warning in tty_lock_pair(v1)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:01:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120525150141.7a099aa3@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337953922.9783.205.camel@laptop>
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:52:02 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 14:47 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Having looked at the source I still don't see how it could possibly
> > > work,.. So the problem with tty_release() -> tty_ldisc_release() is
> > > that tty_ldisc_release() does an unlock/lock of tty.
> >
> > Yes it should do the pair, see the patch I posted restructing it, and
> > the second one restructing it right.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133794355529930
>
> That one? To what tree does one apply that? Because the tty_lock_pair()
> in Linus is still missing a lockdep annotation afaict.
It applies on top of the other patches being tested in the thread on the
lockdep warning.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-25 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-22 1:58 [PATCH] tty: tty_mutex: fix lockdep warning in tty_lock_pair(v1) Ming Lei
2012-05-23 6:01 ` Ming Lei
2012-05-25 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-25 13:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-25 13:47 ` Alan Cox
2012-05-25 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-25 14:01 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2012-05-25 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120525150141.7a099aa3@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox