From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <ibm-acpi@hmh.eng.br>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>, Joey Lee <jlee@novell.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] platform / x86: Convert a few drivers to struct dev_pm_ops
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:26:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201206172226.42729.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
Hi all,
The following series of patches converts a few drivers under platform/x86
to using struct dev_pm_ops objects for power management istead of legacy
callbacks in struct platform_driver.
The ultimate goal of this will be to get rid of PM callbacks from the
platform bus type, which are only necessary because a number of drivers
still use the legacy hooks.
Admittedly, I don't have the hardware to test all of the changes, but
hopefully they are simple enough.
Please let me know if there are any objections.
Thanks,
Rafael
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-17 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-17 20:26 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-06-17 20:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] thinkpad_acpi: Drop pm_message_t arguments from suspend routines Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-24 0:32 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-17 20:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] thinkpad_acpi: Use struct dev_pm_ops instead of legacy PM routines Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-24 0:34 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-06-24 20:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-17 20:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] acer-wmi: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-18 6:56 ` joeyli
2012-06-17 20:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] intel_mid_thermal: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-18 6:03 ` R, Durgadoss
2012-06-17 20:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] intel_ips: Remove empty legacy PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201206172226.42729.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=ibm-acpi@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=jlee@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox