* checkpatch should not complain about 'Suggested-by:'
@ 2012-07-23 17:26 Tony Luck
2012-07-23 20:46 ` Andy Whitcroft
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tony Luck @ 2012-07-23 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Whitcroft; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
checkpatch just gave me:
WARNING: Non-standard signature: Suggested-by:
There are over 500 instances of 'Suggested-by:', and it seems
to have some value in tracking history and awarding credit
where it is due.
"Reported-and-tested-by:" is also in regular use, but not
in the list of "standard" signatures.
-Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: checkpatch should not complain about 'Suggested-by:'
2012-07-23 17:26 checkpatch should not complain about 'Suggested-by:' Tony Luck
@ 2012-07-23 20:46 ` Andy Whitcroft
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andy Whitcroft @ 2012-07-23 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Luck; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:26:29AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> checkpatch just gave me:
>
> WARNING: Non-standard signature: Suggested-by:
Seems reasonable indeed.
> There are over 500 instances of 'Suggested-by:', and it seems
> to have some value in tracking history and awarding credit
> where it is due.
>
> "Reported-and-tested-by:" is also in regular use, but not
I really wish we didn't have this habit ...
Reported-fixed-tested-reviewed-and-signed-off-by: isn't easy to deal
with :/.
> in the list of "standard" signatures.
Will poke.
Cheers.
-apw
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-23 20:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-23 17:26 checkpatch should not complain about 'Suggested-by:' Tony Luck
2012-07-23 20:46 ` Andy Whitcroft
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox