From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Remove rcu_switch()
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:39:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121003183945.GP2527@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349288512-2635-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 08:21:52PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> It's only there to call rcu_user_hooks_switch(). Let's
> just call rcu_user_hooks_switch() directly, we don't need this
> function in the middle.
Hello, Frederic!
Doesn't this also require an empty definition of rcu_user_hooks_switch()
to handle the CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS=n case? Or is there already such
a definition that I am too blind to see?
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/sched.h | 8 --------
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 7c968e4..5d009de 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -204,6 +204,8 @@ static inline void rcu_user_enter(void) { }
> static inline void rcu_user_exit(void) { }
> static inline void rcu_user_enter_after_irq(void) { }
> static inline void rcu_user_exit_after_irq(void) { }
> +static inline void rcu_user_hooks_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
> + struct task_struct *next) { }
> #endif /* CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS */
>
> extern void exit_rcu(void);
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 9d51e26..65e2694 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1886,14 +1886,6 @@ static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
>
> #endif
>
> -static inline void rcu_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
> - struct task_struct *next)
> -{
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS
> - rcu_user_hooks_switch(prev, next);
> -#endif
> -}
> -
> static inline void tsk_restore_flags(struct task_struct *task,
> unsigned long orig_flags, unsigned long flags)
> {
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index c177472..a48bef7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1887,7 +1887,7 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
> #endif
>
> /* Here we just switch the register state and the stack. */
> - rcu_switch(prev, next);
> + rcu_user_hooks_switch(prev, next);
> switch_to(prev, next, prev);
>
> barrier();
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-03 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-03 18:21 [PATCH] rcu: Remove rcu_switch() Frederic Weisbecker
2012-10-03 18:39 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-10-03 20:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-10-03 20:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121003183945.GP2527@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox