* [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Fix the PWM polarity
2012-11-14 11:58 [PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Various small fixes Alban Bedel
@ 2012-11-14 11:58 ` Alban Bedel
2012-11-23 9:34 ` Alexandre Pereira da Silva
2012-11-14 11:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Properly disable the clock on device remove Alban Bedel
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alban Bedel @ 2012-11-14 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding
Cc: linux-kernel, Roland Stigge, Alexandre Pereira da Silva,
Alban Bedel
The duty cycles value goes from 1 (99% HIGH) to 256 (0% HIGH) but it
is stored modulo 256 in the register as it is only 8 bits wide.
Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
index adb87f0..03ec3ff 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
@@ -49,9 +49,24 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
c = 0; /* 0 set division by 256 */
period_cycles = c;
+ /* The duty value is a follow:
+ *
+ * DUTY HIGH LEVEL
+ * 1 99.9%
+ * 25 90.0%
+ * 128 50.0%
+ * 220 10.0%
+ * 255 0.1%
+ * 0 0.0%
+ *
+ * In other word the in-register value is duty % 256 with duty
+ * in the range 1-256.
+ */
c = 256 * duty_ns;
do_div(c, period_ns);
- duty_cycles = c;
+ if (c > 255)
+ c = 255;
+ duty_cycles = 256 - c;
writel(PWM_ENABLE | PWM_RELOADV(period_cycles) | PWM_DUTY(duty_cycles),
lpc32xx->base + (pwm->hwpwm << 2));
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Fix the PWM polarity
2012-11-14 11:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Fix the PWM polarity Alban Bedel
@ 2012-11-23 9:34 ` Alexandre Pereira da Silva
2012-11-23 9:53 ` Roland Stigge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Pereira da Silva @ 2012-11-23 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alban Bedel; +Cc: Thierry Reding, linux-kernel, Roland Stigge
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Alban Bedel
<alban.bedel@avionic-design.de> wrote:
> The duty cycles value goes from 1 (99% HIGH) to 256 (0% HIGH) but it
> is stored modulo 256 in the register as it is only 8 bits wide.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
Acked-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
> index adb87f0..03ec3ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
> @@ -49,9 +49,24 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> c = 0; /* 0 set division by 256 */
> period_cycles = c;
>
> + /* The duty value is a follow:
> + *
> + * DUTY HIGH LEVEL
> + * 1 99.9%
> + * 25 90.0%
> + * 128 50.0%
> + * 220 10.0%
> + * 255 0.1%
> + * 0 0.0%
> + *
> + * In other word the in-register value is duty % 256 with duty
> + * in the range 1-256.
> + */
> c = 256 * duty_ns;
> do_div(c, period_ns);
> - duty_cycles = c;
> + if (c > 255)
> + c = 255;
> + duty_cycles = 256 - c;
>
> writel(PWM_ENABLE | PWM_RELOADV(period_cycles) | PWM_DUTY(duty_cycles),
> lpc32xx->base + (pwm->hwpwm << 2));
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Fix the PWM polarity
2012-11-23 9:34 ` Alexandre Pereira da Silva
@ 2012-11-23 9:53 ` Roland Stigge
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Roland Stigge @ 2012-11-23 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Pereira da Silva; +Cc: Alban Bedel, Thierry Reding, linux-kernel
On 11/23/2012 10:34 AM, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Alban Bedel
> <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de> wrote:
>> The duty cycles value goes from 1 (99% HIGH) to 256 (0% HIGH) but it
>> is stored modulo 256 in the register as it is only 8 bits wide.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@gmail.com>
When the below doc typos are fixed,
Acked-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>> index adb87f0..03ec3ff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>> @@ -49,9 +49,24 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> c = 0; /* 0 set division by 256 */
>> period_cycles = c;
>>
>> + /* The duty value is a follow:
>> + *
>> + * DUTY HIGH LEVEL
>> + * 1 99.9%
>> + * 25 90.0%
>> + * 128 50.0%
>> + * 220 10.0%
>> + * 255 0.1%
>> + * 0 0.0%
>> + *
>> + * In other word the in-register value is duty % 256 with duty
>> + * in the range 1-256.
>> + */
>> c = 256 * duty_ns;
>> do_div(c, period_ns);
>> - duty_cycles = c;
>> + if (c > 255)
>> + c = 255;
>> + duty_cycles = 256 - c;
>>
>> writel(PWM_ENABLE | PWM_RELOADV(period_cycles) | PWM_DUTY(duty_cycles),
>> lpc32xx->base + (pwm->hwpwm << 2));
>> --
>> 1.7.0.4
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Properly disable the clock on device remove
2012-11-14 11:58 [PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Various small fixes Alban Bedel
2012-11-14 11:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Fix the PWM polarity Alban Bedel
@ 2012-11-14 11:58 ` Alban Bedel
2012-11-16 20:16 ` Thierry Reding
[not found] ` <CAAAP30GTuCB6FCvM9v-ju8y5b+UhQdDnEnHALtewfOzWnD1v=A@mail.gmail.com>
2012-11-14 11:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Set the chip base for dynamic allocation Alban Bedel
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alban Bedel @ 2012-11-14 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding
Cc: linux-kernel, Roland Stigge, Alexandre Pereira da Silva,
Alban Bedel
A single clock is used for all PWMs meaning the clock ref count might
be between 0 and N when remove() is called. Instead of a single
clk_disable() call pwm_disable() on each PWM, that ensure that
clk_disable() is called for each PWM that were still enabled.
Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
index 03ec3ff..f45ce2c 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
@@ -136,8 +136,11 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int __devexit lpc32xx_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct lpc32xx_pwm_chip *lpc32xx = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0 ; i < lpc32xx->chip.npwm ; i += 1)
+ pwm_disable(&lpc32xx->chip.pwms[i]);
- clk_disable(lpc32xx->clk);
return pwmchip_remove(&lpc32xx->chip);
}
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Properly disable the clock on device remove
2012-11-14 11:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Properly disable the clock on device remove Alban Bedel
@ 2012-11-16 20:16 ` Thierry Reding
[not found] ` <CAAAP30GTuCB6FCvM9v-ju8y5b+UhQdDnEnHALtewfOzWnD1v=A@mail.gmail.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2012-11-16 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alban Bedel; +Cc: linux-kernel, Roland Stigge, Alexandre Pereira da Silva
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 403 bytes --]
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:58:14PM +0100, Alban Bedel wrote:
[...]
> static int __devexit lpc32xx_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct lpc32xx_pwm_chip *lpc32xx = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + int i;
This should rather be unsigned int since pwm_chip.npwm is unsigned as
well.
> +
> + for (i = 0 ; i < lpc32xx->chip.npwm ; i += 1)
No space before ';' and "i++" please.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread[parent not found: <CAAAP30GTuCB6FCvM9v-ju8y5b+UhQdDnEnHALtewfOzWnD1v=A@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Properly disable the clock on device remove
[not found] ` <CAAAP30GTuCB6FCvM9v-ju8y5b+UhQdDnEnHALtewfOzWnD1v=A@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2012-11-23 9:55 ` Roland Stigge
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Roland Stigge @ 2012-11-23 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Pereira da Silva; +Cc: Alban Bedel, LKML, Thierry Reding
On 11/22/2012 11:31 PM, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote:
> Em 14/11/2012 09:58, "Alban Bedel" <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de> escreveu:
>>
>> A single clock is used for all PWMs meaning the clock ref count might
>> be between 0 and N when remove() is called. Instead of a single
>> clk_disable() call pwm_disable() on each PWM, that ensure that
>> clk_disable() is called for each PWM that were still enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@gmail.com>
Some style fixes necessary below (Thierry will take care of it), otherwise:
Acked-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>> index 03ec3ff..f45ce2c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>> @@ -136,8 +136,11 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>> static int __devexit lpc32xx_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct lpc32xx_pwm_chip *lpc32xx = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0 ; i < lpc32xx->chip.npwm ; i += 1)
>> + pwm_disable(&lpc32xx->chip.pwms[i]);
>>
>> - clk_disable(lpc32xx->clk);
>> return pwmchip_remove(&lpc32xx->chip);
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.0.4
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Set the chip base for dynamic allocation
2012-11-14 11:58 [PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Various small fixes Alban Bedel
2012-11-14 11:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Fix the PWM polarity Alban Bedel
2012-11-14 11:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Properly disable the clock on device remove Alban Bedel
@ 2012-11-14 11:58 ` Alban Bedel
2012-11-23 9:35 ` Alexandre Pereira da Silva
2012-11-22 21:43 ` [PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Various small fixes Thierry Reding
2012-12-06 7:58 ` Thierry Reding
4 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alban Bedel @ 2012-11-14 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding
Cc: linux-kernel, Roland Stigge, Alexandre Pereira da Silva,
Alban Bedel
Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
index f45ce2c..3e63689 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
lpc32xx->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
lpc32xx->chip.ops = &lpc32xx_pwm_ops;
lpc32xx->chip.npwm = 2;
+ lpc32xx->chip.base = -1;
ret = pwmchip_add(&lpc32xx->chip);
if (ret < 0) {
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Set the chip base for dynamic allocation
2012-11-14 11:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Set the chip base for dynamic allocation Alban Bedel
@ 2012-11-23 9:35 ` Alexandre Pereira da Silva
2012-11-23 9:51 ` Roland Stigge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Pereira da Silva @ 2012-11-23 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alban Bedel; +Cc: Thierry Reding, linux-kernel, Roland Stigge
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Alban Bedel
<alban.bedel@avionic-design.de> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
Acked-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
> index f45ce2c..3e63689 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> lpc32xx->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> lpc32xx->chip.ops = &lpc32xx_pwm_ops;
> lpc32xx->chip.npwm = 2;
> + lpc32xx->chip.base = -1;
>
> ret = pwmchip_add(&lpc32xx->chip);
> if (ret < 0) {
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Set the chip base for dynamic allocation
2012-11-23 9:35 ` Alexandre Pereira da Silva
@ 2012-11-23 9:51 ` Roland Stigge
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Roland Stigge @ 2012-11-23 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Pereira da Silva; +Cc: Alban Bedel, Thierry Reding, linux-kernel
On 11/23/2012 10:35 AM, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Alban Bedel
> <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@avionic-design.de>
>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>> index f45ce2c..3e63689 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> lpc32xx->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
>> lpc32xx->chip.ops = &lpc32xx_pwm_ops;
>> lpc32xx->chip.npwm = 2;
>> + lpc32xx->chip.base = -1;
>>
>> ret = pwmchip_add(&lpc32xx->chip);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> --
>> 1.7.0.4
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Various small fixes
2012-11-14 11:58 [PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Various small fixes Alban Bedel
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-14 11:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Set the chip base for dynamic allocation Alban Bedel
@ 2012-11-22 21:43 ` Thierry Reding
2012-12-06 7:58 ` Thierry Reding
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2012-11-22 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alban Bedel; +Cc: linux-kernel, Roland Stigge, Alexandre Pereira da Silva
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 694 bytes --]
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:58:12PM +0100, Alban Bedel wrote:
> A few fixes for the LPC32 PWM driver:
>
> * [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Fix the PWM polarity
> * [PATCH 2/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Properly disable the clock on device remove
> * [PATCH 3/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Set the chip base for dynamic allocation
Roland, Alexandre,
can you guys take a look at these? At least 3 is very straightforward
but I'd still like your Acked-by or Reviewed-by on the other two. Are
there any potential issues? If Alban doesn't resend, I'm tempted to make
the stylistic changes that I requested myself and push them for 3.8.
That is if I get an Acked-by from one of you guys for 1 and 2.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Various small fixes
2012-11-14 11:58 [PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Various small fixes Alban Bedel
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-11-22 21:43 ` [PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Various small fixes Thierry Reding
@ 2012-12-06 7:58 ` Thierry Reding
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2012-12-06 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alban Bedel; +Cc: linux-kernel, Roland Stigge, Alexandre Pereira da Silva
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 401 bytes --]
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:58:12PM +0100, Alban Bedel wrote:
> A few fixes for the LPC32 PWM driver:
>
> * [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Fix the PWM polarity
> * [PATCH 2/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Properly disable the clock on device remove
> * [PATCH 3/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Set the chip base for dynamic allocation
All three patches applied, with the minor fixes that Roland and I
requested.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread