* linux-next: rebase of the h8300-remove tree
@ 2013-09-04 23:56 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-05 0:12 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-09-04 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 208 bytes --]
Hi Guenter,
Why did you bother rebasing the h8300-remove tree? None of the patches
changed at all (not that that would matter).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: rebase of the h8300-remove tree
2013-09-04 23:56 linux-next: rebase of the h8300-remove tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2013-09-05 0:12 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2013-09-05 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:56:57AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> Why did you bother rebasing the h8300-remove tree? None of the patches
> changed at all (not that that would matter).
>
Just wanted it based on v3.11. But you are right, it was unnecessary.
Won't happen again.
Note that I don't plan to send it to Linus in this commit window.
I thought about it, but it seems to be a bit too hasty.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-05 0:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-04 23:56 linux-next: rebase of the h8300-remove tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-05 0:12 ` Guenter Roeck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox