public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@arm.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 18:38:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140528173858.GG5099@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpo=AnusM2FGs=JLozSyTc0N7SDXQxe+rPiLEHP6ewxY4ow@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 508 bytes --]

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:59:37PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28 May 2014 00:59, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> > Hrm, I'd have expected this to return -EINVAL when stubbed.  I'd also
> > have expected regulator_set_voltage() to return -EINVAL mind you.  I

> Or ENOSYS ? I will fix both routines once you confirm..

Whatever - I don't think the particular code makes any practical
difference.  We would need to audit existing users who don't have a
REGULATOR dependency for breakage though.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-28 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-27 12:07 [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR Viresh Kumar
2014-05-27 12:07 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove dependency on THERMAL and REGULATOR Viresh Kumar
2014-05-27 19:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR Mark Brown
2014-05-27 23:12   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-28 17:37     ` Mark Brown
2014-05-28 16:29   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-28 17:38     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2014-06-02  7:20       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-02  9:51         ` Mark Brown
2014-06-02  9:54           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-02 10:02             ` Mark Brown
2014-06-02 10:15               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-02 12:23                 ` Mark Brown
2014-06-02 13:14                   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-02 15:20                     ` Mark Brown
2014-06-02 16:55                       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-03 10:52                         ` Mark Brown
2014-06-03 14:40       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-03 14:53         ` Mark Brown
2014-06-03 15:22           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-03 15:32             ` Mark Brown
2014-06-03 15:35               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-03 16:02                 ` Mark Brown
2014-06-03 15:25           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-03 15:48             ` Mark Brown
2014-06-04  5:46               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-04 10:38                 ` Mark Brown
2014-06-04 10:57                   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-04 12:33                     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140528173858.GG5099@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=arvind.chauhan@arm.com \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox