Re: [GIT PULL for v3.18-rc1] media updates

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>]

Em Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:05:38 +0100
Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> escreveu:

> On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 18:54 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:45:56 +0100
> > Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> escreveu: 
> > > This typo is still present in both next-20141110 and v3.18-rc4. And I've
> > > first reported it nearly two months ago. I see two fixes:
> > >     1) s/HAS_MMU/MMU/
> > >     2) s/ || (COMPILE_TEST && HAS_MMU)//
> > > 
> > > Which would you prefer?
> > 
> > Hmm... Probably patchwork didn't get your patch.
> 
> There's no patch, not yet. I try to report stuff like this before
> sending patches. The idea here being that the people familiar with the
> code tend to fix things better and quicker.
> 
> > IMHO, the best would be:
> > 
> > 	depends on HAS_MMU
> 
> You really like the HAS_MMU symbol, don't you?


I got distracted by your (2) alternative:

> > >     2) s/ || (COMPILE_TEST && HAS_MMU)//

anyway you got it ;)

> 
> > 	depends on ARCH_OMAP2 || ARCH_OMAP3 || COMPILE_TEST
> 
> But I understand what you're suggesting here. Should I draft a, probably
> untested, patch?

Sure.

Thanks!
Mauro