From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cputime: Make the reported utime+stime correspond to the actual runtime.
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 13:01:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150612110158.GA18673@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434104217.1495.74.camel@twins>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:16:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:55 +0200, Fredrik Markstrom wrote:
> > The scaling mechanism might sometimes cause top to report >100%
> > (sometimes > 1000%) cpu usage for a single thread. This patch makes
> > sure that stime+utime corresponds to the actual runtime of the thread.
>
> This Changelog is inadequate, it does not explain the actual problem.
>
> > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(prev_time_lock);
>
> global (spin)locks are bad.
Since you have a proglet handy to test this; does something like the
below help anything?
---
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index f5a64ffad176..3d3f60a555a0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -613,6 +613,10 @@ static void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime *curr,
stime = scale_stime((__force u64)stime,
(__force u64)rtime, (__force u64)total);
+
+ if (stime < prev->stime)
+ stime = prev->stime;
+
utime = rtime - stime;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-12 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-12 8:55 [PATCH 0/1] cputime: Make the reported utime+stime correspond to the actual runtime Fredrik Markstrom
2015-06-12 8:55 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Fredrik Markstrom
2015-06-12 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-12 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-06-15 15:34 ` Fredrik Markström
2015-06-16 14:35 ` Fredrik Markström
2015-06-29 14:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-29 15:28 ` Fredrik Markström
2015-06-29 18:54 ` Jason Low
2015-06-29 19:08 ` Fredrik Markström
2015-06-29 22:11 ` Jason Low
2015-06-30 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-30 11:50 ` Fredrik Markström
2015-06-30 12:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-30 18:30 ` Fredrik Markström
2015-07-02 12:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-02 13:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-07 0:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-07 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-07 8:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-07 12:10 ` Fredrik Markström
2015-07-07 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-07 13:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-07 15:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-07 16:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-06-13 11:17 ` Fredrik Markström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150612110158.GA18673@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox