* Re: 3.18: lockdep problems in cpufreq
[not found] ` <4248436.YMvuzoKMLH@vostro.rjw.lan>
@ 2015-08-18 9:30 ` Eduardo Valentin
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Eduardo Valentin @ 2015-08-18 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux, Viresh Kumar, Yadwinder Singh Brar,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
LKML
Hi there,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
<cut>
>
> Well, that's the situation as per MAINTAINERS today. You seem to be concerned
> that it may not reflect the reality, but in that case I can only recommend
> sending a patch against MAINTAINERS to remove Eduardo from there.
>
>> As I've said, I'm not bothering with this anymore, it's just far too
>> much effort to play these stupid games.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "these stupid games" here.
>
>> The deadlock can stay for all I care.
>
> Fair enough.
I applied the patch. And it has generated the conflict in linux-next, as was mentioned in this thread. I already sent the pull request.
Yes, I missed the thread. Apologize for this and for the inconvenience I have caused. The deadlock will be taken care using Russel's patch.
Thanks Viresh for notifying me.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
BR,
--
Eduardo Bezerra Valentin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread