From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] nohz: New tick dependency mask
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:57:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208155703.GA4192@lerouge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202150908.GR3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 04:09:08PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:08:16PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:56:33AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:20:28PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > > > + prev = fetch_or(dep, BIT_MASK(bit));
> > > > > > + if (!prev) {
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * We need the IPIs to be sent from sane process context.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why ?
> > > >
> > > > Because posix timers code is all called with interrupts disabled and we can't
> > > > send IPIs then.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > + * The posix cpu timers are always set with irqs disabled.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + schedule_work(&kick_all_work);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * Set a global tick dependency. Lets do the wide IPI kick asynchronously
> > > > > > + * for callers with irqs disabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > This seems to suggest you can call this with IRQs disabled
> > > >
> > > > Ah right, that's a misleading comment. We need to use the _delayed() version
> > > > when interrupts are disabled.
> > >
> > > Why can't you use tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu() for all that, which is
> > > usable from IRQ context and avoid all that delayed muck?
> >
> > Because I need to kick all the CPUs where the task/signal is running on. That's
> > a bit difficult to do though. I think we had something to try to send an IPI to a task,
> > but I can't retrieve it. Looks easy to do anyway. But in the signal case I'd need to do
> > that for all tasks in the group. That sounds like a costly loop.
> >
> > So I simplify that with a global IPI.
>
> Sure, but what I meant was that:
>
> for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
> tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(cpu);
>
> is IRQ safe, whereas the current thingy is not. Sure, its a wee bit less
> efficient, but do we really care?
Right, this overhead probably doesn't matter much. I'll do that and we'll see if
people complain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-13 14:22 [PATCH 0/7] nohz: Tick dependency mask v3 Frederic Weisbecker
2015-11-13 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/7] atomic: Export fetch_or() Frederic Weisbecker
2015-11-24 15:58 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-11-24 21:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-11-24 21:48 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-11-30 17:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-11-30 18:17 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-11-25 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-13 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/7] nohz: New tick dependency mask Frederic Weisbecker
2015-11-24 16:19 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-11-25 11:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-01 20:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-01 22:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-02 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-02 14:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-02 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-08 15:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2015-12-02 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-02 14:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-02 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-02 14:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-11-13 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf: Migrate perf to use new tick dependency mask model Frederic Weisbecker
2015-11-24 16:19 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-11-25 12:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-02 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-02 17:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-02 17:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-13 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched: Account rr and fifo tasks separately Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-02 12:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-02 14:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-11-13 14:22 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched: Migrate sched to use new tick dependency mask model Frederic Weisbecker
2015-11-13 14:22 ` [PATCH 6/7] posix-cpu-timers: Migrate " Frederic Weisbecker
2015-11-13 14:22 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched-clock: " Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151208155703.GA4192@lerouge \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox