From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akinobu.mita@gmail.com,
jack@suse.cz, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] lib/spinlock_debug.c: prevent a recursive cycle in the debug code
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:15:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160128071502.GA31266@X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A9497F.6010206@hurleysoftware.com>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:49:35PM -0800, Peter Hurley wrote:
> And we already have lockdep turned off to avoid triggering a recursive
> lockdep report (which I think is a mistake).
Yes, we already have a way to turn off the lock debug so that we can
avoid it. So I used it in v4.
thanks,
byungchul
>
> I think we should be working toward properly handling recursion
> in printk().
>
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
>
>
> > When the debug spinlock code is called from printk(), we should prevent
> > calling spin_dump() and the like, calling printk() again in that context.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/debug_locks.h | 4 ++++
> > kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/debug_locks.h b/include/linux/debug_locks.h
> > index 822c135..b0f977e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/debug_locks.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/debug_locks.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ struct task_struct;
> > extern int debug_locks;
> > extern int debug_locks_silent;
> >
> > +static inline void __debug_locks_on(void)
> > +{
> > + debug_locks = 1;
> > +}
> >
> > static inline int __debug_locks_off(void)
> > {
> > diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c
> > index 0374a59..65177ba 100644
> > --- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c
> > +++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c
> > @@ -113,11 +113,19 @@ static void __spin_lock_debug(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
> > return;
> > __delay(1);
> > }
> > - /* lockup suspected: */
> > - spin_dump(lock, "lockup suspected");
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We should prevent calling printk() further, since it would cause
> > + * an infinite recursive cycle if it's called from printk()!
> > + */
> > + if (__debug_locks_off()) {
> > + /* lockup suspected: */
> > + spin_dump(lock, "lockup suspected");
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > - trigger_all_cpu_backtrace();
> > + trigger_all_cpu_backtrace();
> > #endif
> > + __debug_locks_on();
> > + }
> >
> > /*
> > * The trylock above was causing a livelock. Give the lower level arch
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-28 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-27 12:01 [PATCH v4] lib/spinlock_debug.c: prevent a recursive cycle in the debug code Byungchul Park
2016-01-27 22:49 ` Peter Hurley
2016-01-28 7:15 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2016-01-29 8:19 ` Byungchul Park
2016-01-28 1:42 ` Byungchul Park
2016-01-28 2:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-28 4:36 ` byungchul.park
2016-01-28 6:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-28 8:13 ` Byungchul Park
2016-01-28 10:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-28 10:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-28 15:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-28 23:08 ` Peter Hurley
2016-01-28 23:54 ` Byungchul Park
2016-01-29 0:54 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-29 3:00 ` Byungchul Park
2016-01-29 4:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-29 12:15 ` Byungchul Park
2016-01-29 0:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-29 4:32 ` Peter Hurley
2016-01-29 5:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-29 5:48 ` Peter Hurley
2016-01-29 6:16 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-29 6:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-31 12:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-31 12:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] printk: introduce console_reset_on_panic() function Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-31 12:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] printk: introduce reset_console_drivers() Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-31 12:47 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-31 12:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] spinlock_debug: panic on recursive lock spin_dump() Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-02-01 16:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-02-02 7:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-31 12:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] printk: introduce console_reset_on_panic() function kbuild test robot
2016-01-29 6:54 ` [PATCH v4] lib/spinlock_debug.c: prevent a recursive cycle in the debug code Byungchul Park
2016-01-29 7:13 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-01-29 8:13 ` Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160128071502.GA31266@X58A-UD3R \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox