public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Caesar Wang" <wxt@rock-chips.com>,
	"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Stephen Barber" <smbarber@chromium.org>,
	"Douglas Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
	"Brian Norris" <briannorris@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: reorder initialization steps in regulator_register()
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:39:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160412123916.54a0428e@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460457060-3946-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:31:00 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> device_register() is calling ->get_voltage() as part of is sysfs attribute

							  ^ its

> initialization process, and this functions might need to know the regulator
> constraints to return a valid value.
> This is at least true for the pwm regulator driver (when operating in
> continuous mode) which needs to know the minimum and maximum voltage values
> to calculate the current voltage:
> 
> min_uV + (((max_uV - min_uV) * dutycycle) / 100);
> 
> Move device_register() after set_machine_constraints() to make sure those
> constraints are correctly initialized when ->get_voltage() is called.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Reported-by: Stephen Barber <smbarber@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/core.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index e0b7642..8258568 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -3950,13 +3950,6 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>  	rdev->dev.parent = dev;
>  	dev_set_name(&rdev->dev, "regulator.%lu",
>  		    (unsigned long) atomic_inc_return(&regulator_no));
> -	ret = device_register(&rdev->dev);
> -	if (ret != 0) {
> -		put_device(&rdev->dev);
> -		goto wash;
> -	}
> -
> -	dev_set_drvdata(&rdev->dev, rdev);
>  
>  	/* set regulator constraints */
>  	if (init_data)
> @@ -3964,7 +3957,15 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>  
>  	ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev, constraints);
>  	if (ret < 0)
> -		goto scrub;
> +		goto wash;
> +
> +	ret = device_register(&rdev->dev);
> +	if (ret != 0) {
> +		put_device(&rdev->dev);
> +		goto wash;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(&rdev->dev, rdev);
>  
>  	if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
>  		rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
> @@ -3993,8 +3994,6 @@ out:
>  
>  unset_supplies:
>  	unset_regulator_supplies(rdev);
> -
> -scrub:
>  	regulator_ena_gpio_free(rdev);
>  	device_unregister(&rdev->dev);
>  	/* device core frees rdev */
> @@ -4002,6 +4001,7 @@ scrub:
>  	goto out;
>  
>  wash:
> +	kfree(rdev->constraints);
>  	regulator_ena_gpio_free(rdev);
>  clean:
>  	kfree(rdev);



-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-12 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-12 10:31 [PATCH] regulator: reorder initialization steps in regulator_register() Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 10:39 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-04-12 11:02 ` Caesar Wang
2016-04-13  6:41 ` Applied "regulator: reorder initialization steps in regulator_register()" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2016-04-13  6:41 ` [PATCH] regulator: reorder initialization steps in regulator_register() Mark Brown
2016-04-14 16:21   ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160412123916.54a0428e@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=smbarber@chromium.org \
    --cc=wxt@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox