From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: "Stephen Barber" <smbarber@chromium.org>,
"Caesar Wang" <wxt@rock-chips.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Caesar Wang" <wxt@rock-chips.com>,
"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Stephen Barber" <smbarber@chromium.org>,
"Douglas Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
"Brian Norris" <briannorris@chromium.org>
Subject: Applied "regulator: reorder initialization steps in regulator_register()" to the regulator tree
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:41:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1aqEUS-0002Ok-40@debutante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460457060-3946-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
The patch
regulator: reorder initialization steps in regulator_register()
has been applied to the regulator tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
>From 469b640e4f4a28bdd50f0ac1d2b310907afb464c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:31:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: reorder initialization steps in
regulator_register()
device_register() is calling ->get_voltage() as part of it's sysfs attribute
initialization process, and this functions might need to know the regulator
constraints to return a valid value.
This is at least true for the pwm regulator driver (when operating in
continuous mode) which needs to know the minimum and maximum voltage values
to calculate the current voltage:
min_uV + (((max_uV - min_uV) * dutycycle) / 100);
Move device_register() after set_machine_constraints() to make sure those
constraints are correctly initialized when ->get_voltage() is called.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Barber <smbarber@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index e0b764284773..8258568c793a 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3950,13 +3950,6 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
rdev->dev.parent = dev;
dev_set_name(&rdev->dev, "regulator.%lu",
(unsigned long) atomic_inc_return(®ulator_no));
- ret = device_register(&rdev->dev);
- if (ret != 0) {
- put_device(&rdev->dev);
- goto wash;
- }
-
- dev_set_drvdata(&rdev->dev, rdev);
/* set regulator constraints */
if (init_data)
@@ -3964,7 +3957,15 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev, constraints);
if (ret < 0)
- goto scrub;
+ goto wash;
+
+ ret = device_register(&rdev->dev);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ put_device(&rdev->dev);
+ goto wash;
+ }
+
+ dev_set_drvdata(&rdev->dev, rdev);
if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
@@ -3993,8 +3994,6 @@ out:
unset_supplies:
unset_regulator_supplies(rdev);
-
-scrub:
regulator_ena_gpio_free(rdev);
device_unregister(&rdev->dev);
/* device core frees rdev */
@@ -4002,6 +4001,7 @@ scrub:
goto out;
wash:
+ kfree(rdev->constraints);
regulator_ena_gpio_free(rdev);
clean:
kfree(rdev);
--
2.8.0.rc3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-13 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-12 10:31 [PATCH] regulator: reorder initialization steps in regulator_register() Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 10:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 11:02 ` Caesar Wang
2016-04-13 6:41 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2016-04-13 6:41 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-14 16:21 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1aqEUS-0002Ok-40@debutante \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smbarber@chromium.org \
--cc=wxt@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox