public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>,
	Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: Pass in DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag if inode_dio_begin() called
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 13:16:34 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160414031634.GJ10643@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460484775-33359-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:12:54PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> When performing direct I/O, the current ext4 code does
> not pass in the DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag to dax_do_io() or
> __blockdev_direct_IO() when inode_dio_begin() has, in fact, been
> called. This causes dax_do_io()/__blockdev_direct_IO() to invoke
> inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() internally.  This doubling of
> inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() calls are wasteful.
> 
> This patch removes the extra internal inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end()
> calls when those calls are being issued by the caller directly. For
> really fast storage systems like NVDIMM, the removal of the extra
> inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() can give a meaningful boost to
> I/O performance.

Doesn't this break truncate IO serialisation?

i.e. it appears to me that the ext4 use of inode_dio_begin()/
inode_dio_end() does not cover AIO, where the IO is still in flight
when submission returns. i.e. the inode_dio_end() call
needs to be in IO completion, not in the submitter context. The only
reason it doesn't break right now is that the duplicate accounting
in the DIO code is correct w.r.t. AIO. Hence bypassing the DIO
accounting will cause AIO writes to race with truncate.

Same AIO vs truncate problem occurs with the indirect read case you
modified to skip the direct IO layer accounting.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-14  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-12 18:12 [PATCH v3 0/2] ext4: Improve parallel I/O performance on NVDIMM Waiman Long
2016-04-12 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: Pass in DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag if inode_dio_begin() called Waiman Long
2016-04-14  3:16   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-04-14 16:21     ` Waiman Long
2016-04-15  8:17       ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-15 17:17         ` Waiman Long
2016-04-15 22:19           ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-18 19:46             ` Waiman Long
2016-04-19 23:01               ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-20 15:59                 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-20 20:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-21 18:15     ` Waiman Long
2016-04-25 11:48       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-26 16:32         ` Waiman Long
2016-04-12 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ext4: Make cache hits/misses per-cpu counts Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160414031634.GJ10643@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox