From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>,
Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: Pass in DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag if inode_dio_begin() called
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:17:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160415081757.GK10643@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570FC379.7000107@hpe.com>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:21:13PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 04/13/2016 11:16 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:12:54PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>When performing direct I/O, the current ext4 code does
> >>not pass in the DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag to dax_do_io() or
> >>__blockdev_direct_IO() when inode_dio_begin() has, in fact, been
> >>called. This causes dax_do_io()/__blockdev_direct_IO() to invoke
> >>inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() internally. This doubling of
> >>inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() calls are wasteful.
> >>
> >>This patch removes the extra internal inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end()
> >>calls when those calls are being issued by the caller directly. For
> >>really fast storage systems like NVDIMM, the removal of the extra
> >>inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() can give a meaningful boost to
> >>I/O performance.
> >Doesn't this break truncate IO serialisation?
> >
> >i.e. it appears to me that the ext4 use of inode_dio_begin()/
> >inode_dio_end() does not cover AIO, where the IO is still in flight
> >when submission returns. i.e. the inode_dio_end() call
> >needs to be in IO completion, not in the submitter context. The only
> >reason it doesn't break right now is that the duplicate accounting
> >in the DIO code is correct w.r.t. AIO. Hence bypassing the DIO
> >accounting will cause AIO writes to race with truncate.
> >
> >Same AIO vs truncate problem occurs with the indirect read case you
> >modified to skip the direct IO layer accounting.
>
> I don't quite understand how the duplicate accounting is correct wrt
> AIO. Both the direct and indirect paths are something like:
>
> inode_dio_begin()
> ...
> inode_dio_begin()
> ...
> inode_dio_end()
> ...
> inode_dio_end()
With AIO:
inode_dio_begin()
...
inode_dio_begin()
<submit IO, no wait>
...
inode_dio_end()
<ext4 returns to userspace with AIO+DIO in progress>
<some time later DIO completes>
dio_complete
inode_dio_end()
IOWs, the ext4 accounting is broken w.r.t. AIO, where IO submission
does not wait for IO completion before returning.
> What the patch does is to eliminate the innermost
> inode_dio_begin/end pair.
Yes, and with that change inode_dio_wait() no longer waits for
AIO+DIO writes on ext4, hence breaking truncate IO barrier
requirements of inode_dio_wait().
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-15 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-12 18:12 [PATCH v3 0/2] ext4: Improve parallel I/O performance on NVDIMM Waiman Long
2016-04-12 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: Pass in DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag if inode_dio_begin() called Waiman Long
2016-04-14 3:16 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-14 16:21 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-15 8:17 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-04-15 17:17 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-15 22:19 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-18 19:46 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-19 23:01 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-20 15:59 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-20 20:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-21 18:15 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-25 11:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-26 16:32 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-12 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ext4: Make cache hits/misses per-cpu counts Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160415081757.GK10643@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=waiman.long@hpe.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox