public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf/core: introduce pmu_event_flags and PMUEF_READ_CPU_PKG
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:43:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160804144325.GP6862@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470105895-71379-3-git-send-email-davidcc@google.com>

On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 07:44:54PM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -681,9 +681,21 @@ struct perf_event {
>  #endif
>  
>  	struct list_head		sb_list;
> +
> +	/* Per-event flags to generic code set by PMU. */
> +	int				pmu_event_flags;
> +

It appears to me we already have group_flags and attach_state which both
are serialized by ctx->lock.

Could we maybe merge the lot into one flags field?

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-04 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-02  2:44 [PATCH 0/3] remove unnecessary IPI reading uncore events David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-02  2:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf/core: check return value of perf_event_read IPI David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-02  2:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf/core: introduce pmu_event_flags and PMUEF_READ_CPU_PKG David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-04 14:43   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-08-04 17:24     ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-04 15:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-04 17:23     ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-04 17:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-04 17:49         ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-04 15:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-02  2:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86: use PMUEF_READ_CPU_PKG in uncore events David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-02 15:11 ` [PATCH 0/3] remove unnecessary IPI reading " Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160804144325.GP6862@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davidcc@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox