public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	stefan.koch10@gmail.com, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
	Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, USB <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: core: Add runtime resume checking
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:07:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160810090741.GA30158@shlinux2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMz4kuLNo6nOpFO2R_VJCvK_roKmA6FF5p8KL7UjZwYFcpxt-Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 02:43:50PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On 10 August 2016 at 14:18, Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:33:31AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> On 9 August 2016 at 18:26, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:33:33PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> >> >> When the usb device has entered suspend state by runtime suspend method, and
> >> >> the sustem also try to enter suspend state by issuing usb_dev_suspend(), it
> >> >> will issue pm_runtime_resume() function to deal with wrong wakeup setting in
> >> >> choose_wakeup() function.
> >> >>
> >> >> But if usb device resumes failed due to xhci has been into suspend state and
> >> >> hardware is not accessible, which will set runtime errors. Thus when there is
> >> >> slave attached, usb device will resume failed by runtime resume method due to
> >> >> previous runtime errors.
> >> >
> >> > I really can't parse the first sentance in this paragraph, what exactly
> >> > makes xhci so "unique" here?
> >>
> >> Sorry for confusing, I try to explain it clearly. Considering strict
> >> power management for mobile device, we should also power off the usb
> >> controller if there are no slaves attached even though it is usb host
> >> function.
> >>
> >> For example: No slave attached----> usb interface runtime suspend
> >> ----> usb device runtime suspend -----> xhci suspend -----> power off
> >> usb controller. After that if the system wants to enter suspend state,
> >> then it also will issue usb_dev_suspend(), then the
> >> pm_runtime_resume() function (issued in choose_wakeup() function) will
> >> return -ESHUTDOWN due to xhci has been suspend and hardware is not
> >> accessible.
> >
> > Why the controller does not be resumed when the root hub has issued
> > runtime resume?
> 
> Because now there is no slave attached, we will not power on usb
> controller and resume xhci.
> 

I don't know why you set policy like this. Even the controller is
resumed, it will still be suspended by system suspend. What's more,
if you disallow it, how can you change your wakeup setting?
Eg, at runtime suspend, we enable wakeup by default. But for system
sleep, we disable wakeup by default.

At runtime, if there is no device on the port, even we resumes the
controller and roohub, it still will be suspended soon.

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-10 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-09  9:33 [PATCH] usb: core: Add runtime resume checking Baolin Wang
2016-08-09 10:26 ` Greg KH
2016-08-10  2:33   ` Baolin Wang
2016-08-10  6:18     ` Peter Chen
2016-08-10  6:43       ` Baolin Wang
2016-08-10  9:07         ` Peter Chen [this message]
2016-08-10  9:35           ` Baolin Wang
2016-08-10 14:25             ` Alan Stern
2016-08-11  3:08               ` Baolin Wang
2016-08-11  6:54                 ` Peter Chen
2016-08-11  8:07                   ` Baolin Wang
2016-08-11  8:19                     ` Peter Chen
2016-08-11  8:41                       ` Baolin Wang
2016-08-11  8:44                         ` Peter Chen
2016-08-11  9:08                           ` Baolin Wang
     [not found]     ` <20160810081707.GB7753@kroah.com>
2016-08-10  8:23       ` Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160810090741.GA30158@shlinux2 \
    --to=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=falakreyaz@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=stefan.koch10@gmail.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox