From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stefan.koch10@gmail.com, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, USB <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: core: Add runtime resume checking
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 14:54:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160811065423.GB18967@shlinux2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMz4ku+r7niWqGuxFR2p_1mogOCpb_Czo6JrD1NRDp+MfFc=DQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:08:52AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On 10 August 2016 at 22:25, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Baolin Wang wrote:
> >
> >> >> >> For example: No slave attached----> usb interface runtime suspend
> >> >> >> ----> usb device runtime suspend -----> xhci suspend -----> power off
> >> >> >> usb controller. After that if the system wants to enter suspend state,
> >> >> >> then it also will issue usb_dev_suspend(), then the
> >> >> >> pm_runtime_resume() function (issued in choose_wakeup() function) will
> >> >> >> return -ESHUTDOWN due to xhci has been suspend and hardware is not
> >> >> >> accessible.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Why the controller does not be resumed when the root hub has issued
> >> >> > runtime resume?
> >> >>
> >> >> Because now there is no slave attached, we will not power on usb
> >> >> controller and resume xhci.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > I don't know why you set policy like this. Even the controller is
> >> > resumed, it will still be suspended by system suspend. What's more,
> >> > if you disallow it, how can you change your wakeup setting?
> >> > Eg, at runtime suspend, we enable wakeup by default. But for system
> >> > sleep, we disable wakeup by default.
> >> >
> >> > At runtime, if there is no device on the port, even we resumes the
> >> > controller and roohub, it still will be suspended soon.
> >>
> >> For saving power, if there is no slave attached, why we need to power
> >> on usb controller and resume xhci? Especially for mobile device.
> >
> > You need to power-on the USB controller in order to change the wakeup
> > setting.
>
> pm_runtime_resume() function issued in choose_wakeup() can just resume
> usb device, which can not power-on the USB controller and resume xHCI.
> Cause the user won't know you need to power-on usb controller now,
> then how to power-on the USB controller when changing wakeup setting?
>
> >
> >> Moreover the usb device runtime suspend/resume is separate with xhci
> >> suspend/resume, when xhci entered suspend state, only slave attaching
> >> can resume xhci.
> >
> > That's right. Suppose the user wants the system to stay asleep when a
> > slave attaches. But when you suspended the xHCI controller, it was set
> > to wake up when a new slave attaches. So when a slave is attached, the
> > controller will wake up the system. That's bad.
> >
> > If the wakeup setting needs to be changed when the system suspend
> > begins, then you have to power-on the controller to make that change.
> >
> > Given a choice between using a little power or behaving incorrectly,
> > you should choose to use the power.
>
> OK. But that is a real problem. It will pm_runtime_resume() falied
> (issued in choose_wakeup()), cause usb controller has powered-off and
> xHCI controller has suspended and we have no method to notify the user
> to power-on USB controller. Any good suggestion to solve this, Alan
> and Peter? Thanks.
>
Maybe you can show us the call stack why pm_runtime_resume has failed
at your environment.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-11 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-09 9:33 [PATCH] usb: core: Add runtime resume checking Baolin Wang
2016-08-09 10:26 ` Greg KH
2016-08-10 2:33 ` Baolin Wang
2016-08-10 6:18 ` Peter Chen
2016-08-10 6:43 ` Baolin Wang
2016-08-10 9:07 ` Peter Chen
2016-08-10 9:35 ` Baolin Wang
2016-08-10 14:25 ` Alan Stern
2016-08-11 3:08 ` Baolin Wang
2016-08-11 6:54 ` Peter Chen [this message]
2016-08-11 8:07 ` Baolin Wang
2016-08-11 8:19 ` Peter Chen
2016-08-11 8:41 ` Baolin Wang
2016-08-11 8:44 ` Peter Chen
2016-08-11 9:08 ` Baolin Wang
[not found] ` <20160810081707.GB7753@kroah.com>
2016-08-10 8:23 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160811065423.GB18967@shlinux2 \
--to=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=falakreyaz@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=stefan.koch10@gmail.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox