From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
dyoung@redhat.com, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86: Fix kdump on x86 with physically hotadded CPUs
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 18:14:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161005161455.GA26029@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610041628120.5049@nanos>
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 04:38:16PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > On 10/04/2016 06:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > While it is the right thing to initialize the package map in that case, it
> > > still papers over a robustness issue in the uncore code, which needs to be
> > > fixed first.
> >
> > I will include a separate patch with an error check for pkg == 0xffff in the
> > uncore code.
>
> 0xffff? That won't help. The id returned is -1 if the entry is not
> initialized. And aside of that just patching that particular place is not
> helping as the uncore code and also rapl is relying on the package map
> being populated.
>
> So we need a sanity check in the initialization code which prevents any of
> this being executed.
I still need to test this, but how about something like this?
thanks,
jirka
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
index 28865938aadf..61d087a2f25d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
@@ -598,8 +598,13 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
static int rapl_cpu_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
+ struct rapl_pmu *pmu;
+ int pkg = topology_logical_package_id(cpu);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(pkg == -1))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
if (pmu)
return 0;
@@ -613,7 +618,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(rapl_timer_ms);
pmu->cpu = -1;
rapl_hrtimer_init(pmu);
- rapl_pmus->pmus[topology_logical_package_id(cpu)] = pmu;
+ rapl_pmus->pmus[pkg] = pmu;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index 463dc7a5a6c3..3f657fbbf787 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ static int __init intel_uncore_init(void)
{
const struct x86_cpu_id *id;
struct intel_uncore_init_fun *uncore_init;
- int pret = 0, cret = 0, ret;
+ int pret = 0, cret = 0, ret, cpu;
id = x86_match_cpu(intel_uncore_match);
if (!id)
@@ -1363,6 +1363,13 @@ static int __init intel_uncore_init(void)
max_packages = topology_max_packages();
+ for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
+ int pkg = topology_logical_package_id(cpu);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(pkg == -1))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
uncore_init = (struct intel_uncore_init_fun *)id->driver_data;
if (uncore_init->pci_init) {
pret = uncore_init->pci_init();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-05 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-03 17:07 [PATCH] arch/x86: Fix kdump on x86 with physically hotadded CPUs Prarit Bhargava
2016-10-03 22:22 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-10-04 10:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-04 12:09 ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-10-04 14:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-04 16:01 ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-10-05 16:14 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2016-10-06 15:25 ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-10-07 6:49 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-10-07 8:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-04 12:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-10-04 14:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-07 13:28 ` [tip:x86/urgent] arch/x86: Handle non enumerated CPU after physical hotplug tip-bot for Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161005161455.GA26029@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox