The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	dyoung@redhat.com, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86: Fix kdump on x86 with physically hotadded CPUs
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:19:59 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610041618390.5049@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161004122717.GA4998@krava>

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:58:04PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > pmu->boxes[pkg] is garbage because pkg was returned as 0xffff.
> > 
> > And that's what needs to be fixed in the first place.
> 
> right, I'll check on that.. but I think we need this fix as well

That's right.
 
> I was wondering if acpi_boot_init was a better place for that, but then
> Prarit suggested in our discussion that the prefill_possible_map() call
> seems to be a hotplug cleanup.. so it seemed to fit

It's the right place for it.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-04 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-03 17:07 [PATCH] arch/x86: Fix kdump on x86 with physically hotadded CPUs Prarit Bhargava
2016-10-03 22:22 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-10-04 10:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-04 12:09   ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-10-04 14:38     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-04 16:01       ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-10-05 16:14       ` Jiri Olsa
2016-10-06 15:25         ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-10-07  6:49           ` Jiri Olsa
2016-10-07  8:02             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-04 12:27   ` Jiri Olsa
2016-10-04 14:19     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-10-07 13:28 ` [tip:x86/urgent] arch/x86: Handle non enumerated CPU after physical hotplug tip-bot for Prarit Bhargava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1610041618390.5049@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox