* NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390003 is not supported @ 2017-01-04 19:03 Dave Jones 2017-01-04 19:23 ` Steve Dickson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Dave Jones @ 2017-01-04 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bfields; +Cc: jlayton, Linux Kernel, linux-nfs Since upgrading to 4.10-rc2, my nfs server has started printing these.. [ 161.668635] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390003 is not supported [ 161.668655] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390004 is not supported [ 161.668670] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390005 is not supported Client is debian's 4.8 kernel with default mount options, so sec=sys What should I be doing to suppress these ? What causes them ? Dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390003 is not supported 2017-01-04 19:03 NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390003 is not supported Dave Jones @ 2017-01-04 19:23 ` Steve Dickson 2017-01-04 19:29 ` Dave Jones 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Steve Dickson @ 2017-01-04 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Jones, bfields, jlayton, Linux Kernel, linux-nfs On 01/04/2017 02:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > Since upgrading to 4.10-rc2, my nfs server has started printing these.. > > [ 161.668635] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390003 is not supported > [ 161.668655] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390004 is not supported > [ 161.668670] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390005 is not supported > > Client is debian's 4.8 kernel with default mount options, so sec=sys > > What should I be doing to suppress these ? What causes them ? The auth_rpcgss or rpcsec_gss_krb5 kernel modules not being loaded?? steved. > > Dave > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390003 is not supported 2017-01-04 19:23 ` Steve Dickson @ 2017-01-04 19:29 ` Dave Jones 2017-01-04 19:48 ` J. Bruce Fields 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Dave Jones @ 2017-01-04 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steve Dickson; +Cc: bfields, jlayton, Linux Kernel, linux-nfs On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:23:58PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > On 01/04/2017 02:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > > Since upgrading to 4.10-rc2, my nfs server has started printing these.. > > > > [ 161.668635] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390003 is not supported > > [ 161.668655] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390004 is not supported > > [ 161.668670] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390005 is not supported > > > > Client is debian's 4.8 kernel with default mount options, so sec=sys > > > > What should I be doing to suppress these ? What causes them ? > The auth_rpcgss or rpcsec_gss_krb5 kernel modules not being loaded?? I don't use kerberos, and CONFIG_SUNRPC_GSS=y Dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390003 is not supported 2017-01-04 19:29 ` Dave Jones @ 2017-01-04 19:48 ` J. Bruce Fields 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2017-01-04 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Jones, Steve Dickson, jlayton, Linux Kernel, linux-nfs, chuck.lever On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:29:01PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:23:58PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > > > > On 01/04/2017 02:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > > > Since upgrading to 4.10-rc2, my nfs server has started printing these.. > > > > > > [ 161.668635] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390003 is not supported > > > [ 161.668655] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390004 is not supported > > > [ 161.668670] NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390005 is not supported > > > > > > Client is debian's 4.8 kernel with default mount options, so sec=sys > > > > > > What should I be doing to suppress these ? What causes them ? > > The auth_rpcgss or rpcsec_gss_krb5 kernel modules not being loaded?? > > I don't use kerberos, and CONFIG_SUNRPC_GSS=y Hm, looks like that warning's from 676e4ebd5f2c "NFSD: SECINFO doesn't handle unsupported pseudoflavors correctly", which went into 3.10-rc1. So mountd is probably telling us that krb5/krb5i/krb5p are permitted on some exports, though your kernel doesn't think it supports those for some reason. The exports are probably the v4 pseudoroot exports (I don't think normal exports get the krb5 flavors unless you explicitly ask for them). So this is partly also the fault of nfs-utils 4a1ad4aa3028 "mountd: Enable all auth flavors on pseudofs exports". I don't know why your kernel doesn't think it supports those.... Is it possible to have have CONFIG_SUNRPC_GSS set and not CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5? Maybe simplest is just demote that printk to a debugging thing. It was intended to help debug the case when somebody tries to, say, add sec=krb5 exports but doesn't get the kernel configuration right, but with mountd passing everything down in some cases it's not so helpful. --b. > > Dave > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-04 19:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-01-04 19:03 NFS: SECINFO: security flavor 390003 is not supported Dave Jones 2017-01-04 19:23 ` Steve Dickson 2017-01-04 19:29 ` Dave Jones 2017-01-04 19:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox