From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null)
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:31:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170309183124.x6hogxfwkgljirfj@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170309091447.357e0028@gandalf.local.home>
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 09:14:47AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:29:59 -0600
> Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > [adding Steven Rostedt to CC as an FYI]
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:25:01AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > - CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER sets it on x86-32 because of a gcc bug
> > > > where the stack gets aligned before the mcount call. This issue
> > > > should be mostly obsolete as most modern compilers now have -mfentry.
> > > > We could make it dependent on CC_USING_FENTRY.
> > >
> > > Yeah. At some point we might even upgrade the compiler requirements to
> > > no longer accept the mcount model.
> >
> > The plot slightly thickens...
> >
> > So I was mistaken about this problem not existing with newer versions of
> > gcc, because the x86-32 ftrace code doesn't use -mfentry. It still
> > relies on mcount. So CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER will still need
> > -maccumulate-outgoing-args for *all* versions of gcc on x86-32.
>
> OK, I admit, I was lazy here. I thought, who cares about x86-32
> anymore ;-)
As we just saw in another thread where somebody ran into this problem
with -Os, apparently some people still do care...
> > (Of course, that situation would improve if ftrace on x86-32 were ported
> > to use -mfentry.)
>
> That can easily be done.
You weren't on CC earlier, so just to summarize the benefits of doing
fentry on x86-32, thus removing the need for -maccumulate-outgoing-args:
- graph tracer compatibility with -Os
- text size decrease of ~3%
- possible performance improvement
- more uniformity (-maccumulate-outgoing-args disabled everywhere for
modern gccs)
But either way I'll still work up a patch to make the changes I
suggested.
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-09 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-21 22:14 v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null) Pavel Machek
2017-02-21 23:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-21 23:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-02-22 16:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 20:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-02-22 21:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 21:05 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-22 21:21 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 22:47 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-22 22:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 23:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-23 20:10 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-25 5:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 23:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-06 16:38 ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-07 17:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 17:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-07 17:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-07 18:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 18:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-08 17:37 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-08 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-08 18:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-08 21:22 ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-09 9:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-09 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-09 12:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-10 13:17 ` Compiling kernels faster (was Re: v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null)) Pavel Machek
2017-03-10 13:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-10 14:15 ` Willy Tarreau
2017-03-09 10:49 ` Old compiler versions " Pavel Machek
2017-03-09 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-09 15:29 ` v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null) Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-09 21:12 ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-08 21:29 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-09 14:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-09 18:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-03-16 15:42 ` [PATCH] x86: mostly disable '-maccumulate-outgoing-args' Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 17:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 18:36 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 18:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 19:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 19:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 19:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 19:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-22 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-22 15:48 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-28 8:13 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/build: Mostly " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-28 16:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-30 9:58 ` tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170309183124.x6hogxfwkgljirfj@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox