The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null)
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:31:24 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170309183124.x6hogxfwkgljirfj@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170309091447.357e0028@gandalf.local.home>

On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 09:14:47AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:29:59 -0600
> Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > [adding Steven Rostedt to CC as an FYI]
> > 
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:25:01AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:  
> > > > - CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER sets it on x86-32 because of a gcc bug
> > > >   where the stack gets aligned before the mcount call.  This issue
> > > >   should be mostly obsolete as most modern compilers now have -mfentry.
> > > >   We could make it dependent on CC_USING_FENTRY.  
> > > 
> > > Yeah. At some point we might even upgrade the compiler requirements to
> > > no longer accept the mcount model.  
> > 
> > The plot slightly thickens...
> > 
> > So I was mistaken about this problem not existing with newer versions of
> > gcc, because the x86-32 ftrace code doesn't use -mfentry.  It still
> > relies on mcount.  So CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER will still need
> > -maccumulate-outgoing-args for *all* versions of gcc on x86-32.
> 
> OK, I admit, I was lazy here. I thought, who cares about x86-32
> anymore ;-)

As we just saw in another thread where somebody ran into this problem
with -Os, apparently some people still do care...

> > (Of course, that situation would improve if ftrace on x86-32 were ported
> > to use -mfentry.)
> 
> That can easily be done.

You weren't on CC earlier, so just to summarize the benefits of doing
fentry on x86-32, thus removing the need for -maccumulate-outgoing-args:

- graph tracer compatibility with -Os
- text size decrease of ~3%
- possible performance improvement
- more uniformity (-maccumulate-outgoing-args disabled everywhere for
  modern gccs)

But either way I'll still work up a patch to make the changes I
suggested.

-- 
Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-09 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-21 22:14 v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null) Pavel Machek
2017-02-21 23:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-21 23:15   ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-02-22 16:45     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 20:51       ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-02-22 21:15         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 21:05   ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-22 21:21     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 22:47       ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-22 22:56         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 23:18           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-23 20:10             ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-25  5:04               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 23:45                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-06 16:38                   ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-07 17:38                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 17:52                       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-07 17:59                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-07 18:28                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 18:30                             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 18:40                             ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-08 17:37                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-08 18:25                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-08 18:54                                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-08 21:22                                   ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-09  9:38                                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-09 10:56                                       ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-09 12:16                                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-10 13:17                                           ` Compiling kernels faster (was Re: v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null)) Pavel Machek
2017-03-10 13:28                                             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-10 14:15                                             ` Willy Tarreau
2017-03-09 10:49                                     ` Old compiler versions " Pavel Machek
2017-03-09 18:05                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-09 15:29                                     ` v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null) Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-09 21:12                                       ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-08 21:29                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-09 14:14                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-09 18:31                                       ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-03-16 15:42                                     ` [PATCH] x86: mostly disable '-maccumulate-outgoing-args' Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 17:32                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 18:36                                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 18:53                                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 19:04                                             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 19:07                                               ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 19:06                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 19:31                                       ` [PATCH v2] " Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-22  7:51                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-22 15:48                                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-28  8:13                                         ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/build: Mostly " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-28 16:17                                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-30  9:58                                         ` tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170309183124.x6hogxfwkgljirfj@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox