From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mostly disable '-maccumulate-outgoing-args'
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:04:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170316190401.bplktmr53r7rlq55@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170316185305.lk4pi3a7b5n6uqjd@treble>
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:53:05PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:36:35PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:32:01PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:42:08 -0500
> > > Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > + ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS := 1
> > > > + endif
> > > > + endif
> > > > +endif
> > > > +
> > > > +# Jump labels need '-maccumulate-outgoing-args' for gcc < 4.5.2 to prevent
> > >
> > > Can we make a test instead? I hate testing versions, and things get
> > > backported all the time. We usually like to have a test case instead of
> > > relying on versions. Not to mention, a newer gcc may one day break.
> >
> > Tests are generally better, but I'm not sure how to test for this
> > cleanly. The test is rather big for embedding in a makefile:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22199
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> After some snooping I discovered there's some precedent for doing this
> in the scripts/gcc-*.sh files. So maybe I'll add a test there and call
> it from the Makefile.
But now I realize that those other tests are just build tests, whereas
this one needs to be executed. That's a no-go for cross compilers. So
I think we need to do the version check after all.
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-16 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-21 22:14 v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null) Pavel Machek
2017-02-21 23:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-21 23:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-02-22 16:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 20:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-02-22 21:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 21:05 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-22 21:21 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 22:47 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-22 22:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 23:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-23 20:10 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-25 5:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 23:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-06 16:38 ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-07 17:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 17:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-07 17:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-07 18:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 18:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-08 17:37 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-08 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-08 18:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-08 21:22 ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-09 9:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-09 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-09 12:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-10 13:17 ` Compiling kernels faster (was Re: v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null)) Pavel Machek
2017-03-10 13:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-10 14:15 ` Willy Tarreau
2017-03-09 10:49 ` Old compiler versions " Pavel Machek
2017-03-09 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-09 15:29 ` v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null) Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-09 21:12 ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-08 21:29 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-09 14:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-09 18:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 15:42 ` [PATCH] x86: mostly disable '-maccumulate-outgoing-args' Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 17:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 18:36 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 18:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 19:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-03-16 19:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 19:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 19:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-22 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-22 15:48 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-28 8:13 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/build: Mostly " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-28 16:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-30 9:58 ` tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170316190401.bplktmr53r7rlq55@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox