public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 7/7] kprobes: Use synchronize_rcu_tasks() for optprobe with CONFIG_PREEMPT
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 07:44:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170929074436.f447187d99e5e78008b15234@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170929073755.ypjz6cidn7aiyxbq@gmail.com>

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:37:55 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> 
> * Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:22:20 +0200
> > Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > * Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > To enable jump optimized probe with CONFIG_PREEMPT, use
> > > > synchronize_rcu_tasks() to wait for all tasks preempted
> > > > on trampoline code back on track.
> > > 
> > > This sentence does not parse. It's missing a verb, but I'm not sure.
> > 
> > Hmm, how about this?
> > 
> > Use synchthnize_rcu_tasks() to wait for all tasks preempted
> > on trampoline code back on track so that jump optimized probe
> > can be enabled with CONFIG_PREEMPT.
> 
> What's "synchthnize"? ...

Oops, it's my typo. my XPS touch pad is really unstable...

> 
> More seriously, I still don't understand it. What is 'back on track'?
> 
> Do you mean to say:
> 
>    We want to wait for all potentially preempted kprobes trampoline execution to 
>    have completed. This guarantees that any freed trampoline memory is not in use
>    by any task in the system anymore. synchronize_rcu_tasks() gives such a
>    guarantee, so use it.

Exactly, this is correct!

Thank you,

> 
> or something else?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-29 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-19  9:58 [PATCH -tip v3 0/7] kprobes/x86: Preempt related enhancements Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-19  9:59 ` [PATCH -tip v3 1/7] kprobes: Improve smoke test to check preemptible Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-28 10:52   ` [tip:perf/core] kprobes: Improve smoke test to check preemptibility tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-19  9:59 ` [PATCH -tip v3 2/7] kprobes/x86: Move get_kprobe_ctlblk in irq-disabled block Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-28 10:52   ` [tip:perf/core] kprobes/x86: Move the get_kprobe_ctlblk() into " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-19 10:00 ` [PATCH -tip v3 3/7] kprobes: Warn if optprobe handler tries to change execution path Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-28 10:53   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2017-10-10 17:02   ` [PATCH -tip v3 3/7] " Naveen N. Rao
2017-10-12  5:04     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-10-17  8:05       ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-19 10:00 ` [PATCH -tip v3 4/7] kprobes/x86: Disable preempt in optprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-28 10:53   ` [tip:perf/core] kprobes/x86: Disable preemption " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-19 10:01 ` [PATCH -tip v3 5/7] kprobes/x86: Disable preempt ftrace-based jprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-28 10:54   ` [tip:perf/core] kprobes/x86: Disable preemption in ftrace-based jprobes tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-19 10:02 ` [PATCH -tip v3 6/7] kprobes/x86: Remove disable_irq from ftrace-based/optimized kprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-28  7:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-29  6:48     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-28 10:54   ` [tip:perf/core] kprobes/x86: Remove IRQ disabling from ftrace-based/optimized kprobes tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-19 10:03 ` [PATCH -tip v3 7/7] kprobes: Use synchronize_rcu_tasks() for optprobe with CONFIG_PREEMPT Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-28  7:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-29  7:29     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-29  7:37       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-29 14:44         ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2017-09-29 17:45           ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-30  5:12             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-10-03 23:57       ` Steven Rostedt
2017-10-04 14:01         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-09-21 22:00 ` [PATCH -tip v3 0/7] kprobes/x86: Preempt related enhancements Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170929074436.f447187d99e5e78008b15234@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox