Re: [PATCH 0/8] livepatch: klp-convert tool

[Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 09:42:09AM -0300, Joao Moreira wrote:
> > Sounds good!  For klp-convert to be successful, we really need a
> > strategy for dealing with such optimizations.  I'm thinking that a
> > '-fpreserve-function-abi' flag would be the cleanest way to handle it.
> > 
> > If we don't have a strategy for dealing with optimizations, then we may
> > instead need to go with a binary diff-based tool like kpatch-build.
> 
> I'm currently looking into binary diff-based solutions to deal with this
> problem. My plan is to submit a second patch set once I have it functional
> and land both things (klp-convert and bin-diff) in two different steps.

Instead of having multiple approaches, I'd strongly prefer that we
converge on a single in-tree approach that works for everybody.

(Whether that will be source-based like klp-convert or binary-based like
kpatch-build, I don't know.)

BTW, what is bin-diff?  Have you seen kpatch-build?

> Is there any issue with following this schedule? Meaning, do you guys still
> plan on reviewing this patch set or do you prefer me to do something
> differently in terms of approach?

IMO, klp-convert will only be useful if we have a realistic strategy for
dealing with GCC optimizations.  So I'd say we should follow through on
that with the compiler folks before spending too much more time on it.

-- 
Josh