From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Chen Yu <chenyu56@huawei.com>
Cc: wangbinghui@hisilicon.com, mathias.nyman@intel.com,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
fanning4@hisilicon.com, lirui39@hisilicon.com,
yangdi10@hisilicon.com, groeck@google.com,
john.stultz@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb:xhci fix panic in xhci_free_virt_devices_depth_first
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:32:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171106113244.GB20217@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a9bb4fa-6e49-7d48-2127-2721bc806255@huawei.com>
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 06:03:08PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017/11/6 16:31, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 04:20:23PM +0800, Yu Chen wrote:
> >> From: Yu Chen <chenyu56@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Check vdev->real_port 0 to avoid panic
> >> [ 9.261347] [<ffffff800884a390>] xhci_free_virt_devices_depth_first+0x58/0x108
> >> [ 9.261352] [<ffffff800884a814>] xhci_mem_cleanup+0x1bc/0x570
> >> [ 9.261355] [<ffffff8008842de8>] xhci_stop+0x140/0x1c8
> >> [ 9.261365] [<ffffff80087ed304>] usb_remove_hcd+0xfc/0x1d0
> >> [ 9.261369] [<ffffff80088551c4>] xhci_plat_remove+0x6c/0xa8
> >> [ 9.261377] [<ffffff80086e928c>] platform_drv_remove+0x2c/0x70
> >> [ 9.261384] [<ffffff80086e6ea0>] __device_release_driver+0x80/0x108
> >> [ 9.261387] [<ffffff80086e7a1c>] device_release_driver+0x2c/0x40
> >> [ 9.261392] [<ffffff80086e5f28>] bus_remove_device+0xe0/0x120
> >> [ 9.261396] [<ffffff80086e2e34>] device_del+0x114/0x210
> >> [ 9.261399] [<ffffff80086e9e00>] platform_device_del+0x30/0xa0
> >> [ 9.261403] [<ffffff8008810bdc>] dwc3_otg_work+0x204/0x488
> >> [ 9.261407] [<ffffff80088133fc>] event_work+0x304/0x5b8
> >> [ 9.261414] [<ffffff80080e31b0>] process_one_work+0x148/0x490
> >> [ 9.261417] [<ffffff80080e3548>] worker_thread+0x50/0x4a0
> >> [ 9.261421] [<ffffff80080e9ea0>] kthread+0xe8/0x100
> >> [ 9.261427] [<ffffff8008083680>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50
> >>
> >> The problem can occur if xhci_plat_remove() is called shortly after
> >> xhci_plat_probe(). While xhci_free_virt_devices_depth_first been
> >> called before the device has been setup and get real_port initialized.
> >> The problem occurred on Hikey960 and was reproduced by Guenter Roeck
> >> on Kevin with chromeos-4.4.
> >>
> >> Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fan Ning <fanning4@hisilicon.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Li Rui <lirui39@hisilicon.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: yangdi <yangdi10@hisilicon.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yu Chen <chenyu56@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 4 ++++
> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
> >> index 2a82c927ded2..0361b4a58f59 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
> >> @@ -947,6 +947,9 @@ void xhci_free_virt_devices_depth_first(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, int slot_id)
> >> if (!vdev)
> >> return;
> >>
> >> + if (WARN_ON(!vdev->real_port))
> >
> > Ok, now you are sending a lot of mess to the kernel log, so what can a
> > user do about it?
> >
> > How can this ever happen? Is it a hardware error, or a kernel driver
> > logic error?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> > .
> >
>
> The problem is a driver logic error, it can reproduced if xhci_plat_remove() is
> called shortly after xhci_plat_probe() while xhci_alloc_virt_device has been called
> but real_port has not been initialized in xhci_setup_addressable_virt_dev.
Who is calling xhci_plat_remove() like this?
> A simple process is as below:
> xhci_plat_probe()
> |
> usb_add_hcd() xhci_plat_remove()
> | |
> find some device usb_remove_hcd()
> | |
> hub_port_connect() -> usb_alloc_dev() usb_disconnect()
> | |
> before hub_enable_device() xhci_stop()
> |
> xhci_mem_cleanup()
> |
> xhci_free_virt_devices_depth_first()
> |
> real_port is 0 access xhci->rh_bw[vdev->real_port-1]
>
> The problem came from https://bugs.96boards.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535
> Also look at crbug.com/700041
Then the bug needs to be fixed, throwing a huge kernel trace message
into the kernel log is not "fixing" the problem at all, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-06 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-06 8:20 [PATCH v2] usb:xhci fix panic in xhci_free_virt_devices_depth_first Yu Chen
2017-11-06 8:31 ` Greg KH
2017-11-06 10:03 ` Chen Yu
2017-11-06 11:32 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-11-06 12:36 ` Chen Yu
2017-11-06 14:00 ` Mathias Nyman
2017-11-06 14:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-11-07 1:55 ` Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171106113244.GB20217@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chenyu56@huawei.com \
--cc=fanning4@hisilicon.com \
--cc=groeck@google.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lirui39@hisilicon.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=wangbinghui@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yangdi10@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox