public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Chen Yu <chenyu56@huawei.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: wangbinghui@hisilicon.com, mathias.nyman@intel.com,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	fanning4@hisilicon.com, lirui39@hisilicon.com,
	yangdi10@hisilicon.com, groeck@google.com,
	john.stultz@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb:xhci fix panic in xhci_free_virt_devices_depth_first
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 16:00:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A006AEA.7050907@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ffd36f31-dbfc-1467-0ae5-e780972ce26e@huawei.com>

On 06.11.2017 14:36, Chen Yu wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/11/6 19:32, Greg KH wrote:
>>> A simple process is as below:
>>> 	xhci_plat_probe()
>>>                 |
>>> 	usb_add_hcd()					xhci_plat_remove()
>>> 	       |						|
>>> 	find some device				usb_remove_hcd()
>>> 	       |						|
>>> 	hub_port_connect() -> usb_alloc_dev()		usb_disconnect()
>>> 	       |						|
>>> 	before hub_enable_device()			xhci_stop()
>>> 								|
>>> 							xhci_mem_cleanup()
>>> 								|
>>> 							xhci_free_virt_devices_depth_first()
>>> 								|
>>> 							real_port is 0 access xhci->rh_bw[vdev->real_port-1]
>>>
>>> The problem came from https://bugs.96boards.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535
>>> Also look at crbug.com/700041
>>
>> Then the bug needs to be fixed, throwing a huge kernel trace message
>> into the kernel log is not "fixing" the problem at all, right?
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>>
>> .
>>
>
> You are right, the way that xhci_plat_remove() to be called needs to be fixed.
> But there is still possibility for this crash.
> What do you think if just add an "xhci_warn" instead of "WARN_ON"?
> +       if (!vdev->real_port) {
> +               xhci_warn(xhci, "Bad vdev->real_port\n");
> +               goto out;
> +       }
> +
>

This patch solves the issue, just drop all the error messages.

vdev->real_port is not set until the the device enable/address
stage, and we know it won't have any children yet then, so no need to
worry about a child having tt pointers to this device.

The "goto out" to xhci_free_virt_device() you do is fine here.

xhci_plat_remove() is the .remove callback for the xhci platform driver.
It might get called before a device is properly enabled/addressed.
Not really a error. A unlikely but possible situation.

xhci_free_tt_info() already has a similar check

Thanks
-Mathias

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-06 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-06  8:20 [PATCH v2] usb:xhci fix panic in xhci_free_virt_devices_depth_first Yu Chen
2017-11-06  8:31 ` Greg KH
2017-11-06 10:03   ` Chen Yu
2017-11-06 11:32     ` Greg KH
2017-11-06 12:36       ` Chen Yu
2017-11-06 14:00         ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2017-11-06 14:00           ` Guenter Roeck
2017-11-07  1:55           ` Chen Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5A006AEA.7050907@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chenyu56@huawei.com \
    --cc=fanning4@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=groeck@google.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lirui39@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=wangbinghui@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yangdi10@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox