Re: [PATCH] mm: Reduce memory bloat with THP

Re: [PATCH] mm: Reduce memory bloat with THP

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 05:28:52PM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> Currently, if the THP enabled policy is "always", or the mode
> is "madvise" and a region is marked as MADV_HUGEPAGE, a hugepage
> is allocated on a page fault if the pud or pmd is empty.  This
> yields the best VA translation performance, but increases memory
> consumption if some small page ranges within the huge page are
> never accessed.
> 
> An alternate behavior for such page faults is to install a
> hugepage only when a region is actually found to be (almost)
> fully mapped and active.  This is a compromise between
> translation performance and memory consumption.  Currently there
> is no way for an application to choose this compromise for the
> page fault conditions above.
> 
> With this change, when an application issues MADV_DONTNEED on a
> memory region, the region is marked as "space-efficient". For
> such regions, a hugepage is not immediately allocated on first
> write.  Instead, it is left to the khugepaged thread to do
> delayed hugepage promotion depending on whether the region is
> actually mapped and active. When application issues
> MADV_HUGEPAGE, the region is marked again as non-space-efficient
> wherein hugepage is allocated on first touch.

I think this would be NAK. At least in this form.

What performance testing have you done? Any numbers?

Making whole vma "space_efficient" just because somebody freed one page
from it is just wrong. And there's no way back after this.

> 
> Orabug: 26910556

Wat?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Re: [PATCH] mm: Reduce memory bloat with THP

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 05:28:52PM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 751e97a..b2ec07b 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ static long madvise_dontneed_single_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  					unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>  {
>  	zap_page_range(vma, start, end - start);
> +	vma->space_efficient = true;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  

And this modifies vma without down_write(mmap_sem).

No.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Re: [PATCH] mm: Reduce memory bloat with THP

[Nitin Gupta]

On 12/15/17 2:00 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 05:28:52PM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>> Currently, if the THP enabled policy is "always", or the mode
>> is "madvise" and a region is marked as MADV_HUGEPAGE, a hugepage
>> is allocated on a page fault if the pud or pmd is empty.  This
>> yields the best VA translation performance, but increases memory
>> consumption if some small page ranges within the huge page are
>> never accessed.
>>
>> An alternate behavior for such page faults is to install a
>> hugepage only when a region is actually found to be (almost)
>> fully mapped and active.  This is a compromise between
>> translation performance and memory consumption.  Currently there
>> is no way for an application to choose this compromise for the
>> page fault conditions above.
>>
>> With this change, when an application issues MADV_DONTNEED on a
>> memory region, the region is marked as "space-efficient". For
>> such regions, a hugepage is not immediately allocated on first
>> write.  Instead, it is left to the khugepaged thread to do
>> delayed hugepage promotion depending on whether the region is
>> actually mapped and active. When application issues
>> MADV_HUGEPAGE, the region is marked again as non-space-efficient
>> wherein hugepage is allocated on first touch.
> 
> I think this would be NAK. At least in this form.
> 
> What performance testing have you done? Any numbers?
> 

I wrote a throw-away code which mmaps 128G area and writes to a random
address in a loop. Together with writes, madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) are
issued at another random addresses. Writes are issued with 70%
probability and DONTNEED with 30%. With this test, I'm trying to emulate
workload of a large in-memory hash-table.

With the patch, I see that memory bloat is much less severe.
I've uploaded the test program with the memory usage plot here:

https://gist.github.com/nitingupta910/42ddf969e17556d74a14fbd84640ddb3

THP was set to 'always' mode in both cases but the result would be the
same if madvise mode was used instead.

> Making whole vma "space_efficient" just because somebody freed one page
> from it is just wrong. And there's no way back after this.
>

I'm using MADV_DONTNEED as a hint that although user wants to
transparently use hugepages but at the same time wants to be more
conservative with respect to memory usage. If a MADV_HUGEPAGE is issued
for a VMA range after any DONTNEEDs then the space_efficient bit is
again cleared, so we revert back to allocating hugepage on fault on
empty pud/pmd.

>>
>> Orabug: 26910556
> 
> Wat?
> 

It's oracle internal identifier used to track this work.

Thanks,
Nitin

Re: [PATCH] mm: Reduce memory bloat with THP

[Nitin Gupta]

On 12/15/17 2:01 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 05:28:52PM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
>> index 751e97a..b2ec07b 100644
>> --- a/mm/madvise.c
>> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
>> @@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ static long madvise_dontneed_single_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>  					unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>>  {
>>  	zap_page_range(vma, start, end - start);
>> +	vma->space_efficient = true;
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
> 
> And this modifies vma without down_write(mmap_sem).
> 

I thought this function was always called with mmmap_sem write locked.
I will check again.

- Nitin

Re: [PATCH] mm: Reduce memory bloat with THP

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:04:03PM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> >> Orabug: 26910556
> > 
> > Wat?
> > 
> 
> It's oracle internal identifier used to track this work.

And as such has no place what so ever outside of oracle. Do not include
junk like that in upstream patches.