From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86-64/Xen: eliminate W+X mappings
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:28:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171218122825.6x33zeknoqbf3xcd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A37B0770200007800198130@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> A few thousand such pages are usually left around due to the re-use of
> L1 tables having been provided by the hypervisor (Dom0) or tool stack
> (DomU). Set NX in the direct map variant, which needs to be done in L2
> due to the dual use of the re-used L1s.
>
> For x86_configure_nx() to actually do what it is supposed to do, call
> get_cpu_cap() first. This was broken by commit 4763ed4d45 ("x86, mm:
> Clean up and simplify NX enablement") when switching away from the
> direct EFER read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> ---
> v2: Adjust comment style and indentation.
> ---
> While I certainly dislike the added header inclusion to obtain the
> prototype for get_cpu_cap(), I couldn't find a better alternative. I'm
> open to suggestions.
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 3 +++
> arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> --- 4.15-rc3/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
> +++ 4.15-rc3-x86_64-Xen-avoid-W+X/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@
> #include "multicalls.h"
> #include "pmu.h"
>
> +#include "../kernel/cpu/cpu.h" /* get_cpu_cap() */
> +
> void *xen_initial_gdt;
>
> static int xen_cpu_up_prepare_pv(unsigned int cpu);
> @@ -1258,6 +1260,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init xen_sta
> __userpte_alloc_gfp &= ~__GFP_HIGHMEM;
>
> /* Work out if we support NX */
> + get_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data);
> x86_configure_nx();
>
> /* Get mfn list */
> --- 4.15-rc4/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
> +++ 4.15-rc4-x86_64-Xen-avoid-W+X/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
> @@ -1902,6 +1902,18 @@ void __init xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(p
> /* Graft it onto L4[511][510] */
> copy_page(level2_kernel_pgt, l2);
>
> + /*
> + * Zap execute permission from the ident map. Due to the sharing of
> + * L1 entries we need to do this in the L2.
> + */
> + if (__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_NX)
> + for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PMD; ++i) {
> + if (pmd_none(level2_ident_pgt[i]))
> + continue;
> + level2_ident_pgt[i] = pmd_set_flags(level2_ident_pgt[i],
> + _PAGE_NX);
> + }
> +
This chunk has two stylistic problems:
- Curly braces need to be added
- Line broken in an ugly fashion: just make it long and ignore the checkpatch col80 warning
looks good otherwise.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-18 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-12 10:24 [PATCH 0/2] x86: deal with remaining W+X pages on Xen Jan Beulich
2017-12-12 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: consider effective protection attributes in W+X check Jan Beulich
2017-12-12 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-12 10:43 ` Jan Beulich
2017-12-12 10:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86-64/Xen: eliminate W+X mappings Jan Beulich
2017-12-12 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-12 10:48 ` Jan Beulich
2017-12-12 10:54 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <5A2FC2280200007800196BB8@suse.com>
2017-12-12 13:14 ` Juergen Gross
2017-12-18 11:11 ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Beulich
2017-12-18 12:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-12-18 15:52 ` Joe Perches
2017-12-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v3] " Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <5A2FBE0A0200007800196B4F@suse.com>
2017-12-14 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: consider effective protection attributes in W+X check Juergen Gross
2017-12-14 14:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-14 14:15 ` Jan Beulich
2017-12-14 14:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-14 14:21 ` Juergen Gross
[not found] <5A2FAEB802000055000F9D66@suse.com>
[not found] ` <5A2FBE540200007800196B52@suse.com>
[not found] ` <5A37B0770200007800198130@suse.com>
2017-12-18 11:50 ` [PATCH v2] x86-64/Xen: eliminate W+X mappings Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171218122825.6x33zeknoqbf3xcd@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox