From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64/Xen: eliminate W+X mappings
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:54:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212105407.6vavvj57i6z2pzxp@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A2FC2280200007800196BB8@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>> On 12.12.17 at 11:38, <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > * Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >> --- 4.15-rc3/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
> >> +++ 4.15-rc3-x86_64-Xen-avoid-W+X/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
> >> @@ -1902,6 +1902,16 @@ void __init xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(p
> >> /* Graft it onto L4[511][510] */
> >> copy_page(level2_kernel_pgt, l2);
> >>
> >> + /* Zap execute permission from the ident map. Due to the sharing of
> >> + * L1 entries we need to do this in the L2. */
> >
> > please use the customary (multi-line) comment style:
> >
> > /*
> > * Comment .....
> > * ...... goes here.
> > */
> >
> > specified in Documentation/CodingStyle.
>
> I would have but didn't because all other comments in this function
> use this (wrong) style. I've concluded that consistency is better
> here than matching the style doc. If the Xen maintainers tell me
> otherwise, I'll happily adjust the patch.
Then it should be cleaned up in a separate patch. The file is in arch/x86/ and
both Documentation/CodingStyle and Linus's position is pretty unambiguous on this,
there's no special exceptions for ugliness in arch/x86/ as far as I'm concerned.
Please guys fix this mess, NAK otherwise.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-12 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-12 10:24 [PATCH 0/2] x86: deal with remaining W+X pages on Xen Jan Beulich
2017-12-12 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: consider effective protection attributes in W+X check Jan Beulich
2017-12-12 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-12 10:43 ` Jan Beulich
2017-12-12 10:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86-64/Xen: eliminate W+X mappings Jan Beulich
2017-12-12 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-12 10:48 ` Jan Beulich
2017-12-12 10:54 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
[not found] ` <5A2FC2280200007800196BB8@suse.com>
2017-12-12 13:14 ` Juergen Gross
2017-12-18 11:11 ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Beulich
2017-12-18 12:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-18 15:52 ` Joe Perches
2017-12-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v3] " Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <5A2FBE0A0200007800196B4F@suse.com>
2017-12-14 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: consider effective protection attributes in W+X check Juergen Gross
2017-12-14 14:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-14 14:15 ` Jan Beulich
2017-12-14 14:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-14 14:21 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171212105407.6vavvj57i6z2pzxp@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox