* [PATCH 1/5] tracing: Check for no filter when processing event filters
@ 2018-06-23 1:20 Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2018-06-23 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton, stable, air icy
[-- Attachment #1: 0001-tracing-Check-for-no-filter-when-processing-event-fi.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2130 bytes --]
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The syzkaller detected a out-of-bounds issue with the events filter code,
specifically here:
prog[N].pred = NULL; /* #13 */
prog[N].target = 1; /* TRUE */
prog[N+1].pred = NULL;
prog[N+1].target = 0; /* FALSE */
-> prog[N-1].target = N;
prog[N-1].when_to_branch = false;
As that's the first reference to a "N-1" index, it appears that the code got
here with N = 0, which means the filter parser found no filter to parse
(which shouldn't ever happen, but apparently it did).
Add a new error to the parsing code that will check to make sure that N is
not zero before going into this part of the code. If N = 0, then -EINVAL is
returned, and a error message is added to the filter.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 80765597bc587 ("tracing: Rewrite filter logic to be simpler and faster")
Reported-by: air icy <icytxw@gmail.com>
bugzilla url: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200019
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
index e1c818dbc0d7..0dceb77d1d42 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
@@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static const char * ops[] = { OPS };
C(TOO_MANY_PREDS, "Too many terms in predicate expression"), \
C(INVALID_FILTER, "Meaningless filter expression"), \
C(IP_FIELD_ONLY, "Only 'ip' field is supported for function trace"), \
- C(INVALID_VALUE, "Invalid value (did you forget quotes)?"),
+ C(INVALID_VALUE, "Invalid value (did you forget quotes)?"), \
+ C(NO_FILTER, "No filter found"),
#undef C
#define C(a, b) FILT_ERR_##a
@@ -550,6 +551,13 @@ predicate_parse(const char *str, int nr_parens, int nr_preds,
goto out_free;
}
+ if (!N) {
+ /* No program? */
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ parse_error(pe, FILT_ERR_NO_FILTER, ptr - str);
+ goto out_free;
+ }
+
prog[N].pred = NULL; /* #13 */
prog[N].target = 1; /* TRUE */
prog[N+1].pred = NULL;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-06-23 1:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-06-23 1:20 [PATCH 1/5] tracing: Check for no filter when processing event filters Steven Rostedt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox