From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Build/qemu test results for v4.18-rc4
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 11:29:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180709182945.GA31159@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3207f3de-0a10-f575-f24f-210a2a926c4c@de.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 08:16:04PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 07/09/2018 08:06 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> >> s390:allmodconfig:
> >>
> >> arch/s390/kernel/als.o: In function `verify_facilities':
> >> als.c:(.init.text+0x24): undefined reference to `latent_entropy'
> >> als.c:(.init.text+0xae): undefined reference to `latent_entropy'
> >> make[3]: *** [arch/s390/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 1
> >> make[2]: *** [arch/s390/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 2
> >> make[1]: *** [bzImage] Error 2
> >>
> >> This problem is only seen when using a compiler which has the relevant
> >> plugins enabled. Bisect points to commit 1658dcee3d43ed ("gcc-plugins:
> >> allow to enable GCC_PLUGINS for COMPILE_TEST") as the culprit. I don't
> >> know if a fix for v4.18 has been submitted. The s390 boot code in -next
> >> has been rearranged and the problem is no longer seen there.
> >
> > Hm, that would imply that mm/page_alloc.o wasn't visible during the
> > als.o linking? But ... if the problem is gone, I guess... good?
>
> als.o is used to detect if the kernel was compiled for a newer generation
> than the hardware that we are running on (very early). So it is compiled
> without gcov, kcov,ubsan and with a different march -in other words special.
> In linux-next we moved the als part to the decompressor which avoids all
> these kind of special handling. As this is part of a bigger patch set it
> would be non-trivial to backport that for 4.18.
> So unless we want to have it fixed for 4.18 I think we are fine.
>
Fine with me. Please let me know if the problem won't be fixed, and I'll
disable allmodconfig test builds for s390 images in v4.18.
Thanks,
Guenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-09 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-09 17:55 Build/qemu test results for v4.18-rc4 Guenter Roeck
2018-07-09 18:06 ` Kees Cook
2018-07-09 18:16 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-07-09 18:19 ` Kees Cook
2018-07-09 18:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-07-09 18:29 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180709182945.GA31159@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox