[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add ASoC maintainers for sound dt-bindings

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add ASoC maintainers for sound dt-bindings

[Clément Péron]

Sound dt-bindings are applied by ASoC maintainers and should be
submit to ASoC list in addition to the devicetree list.

Hence, add this information into the MAINTAINERS file.

Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@gmail.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 0abecc528dac..62701e0135af 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -13930,6 +13930,7 @@ S:	Supported
 F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/
 F:	Documentation/sound/soc/
 F:	sound/soc/
+F:	include/dt-bindings/sound/
 F:	include/sound/soc*
 
 SOUNDWIRE SUBSYSTEM
-- 
2.19.1

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add ASoC maintainers for sound dt-bindings

[Clément Péron]

Gentle up,

Thanks
On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 at 13:15, Clément Péron <peron.clem@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sound dt-bindings are applied by ASoC maintainers and should be
> submit to ASoC list in addition to the devicetree list.
>
> Hence, add this information into the MAINTAINERS file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 0abecc528dac..62701e0135af 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -13930,6 +13930,7 @@ S:      Supported
>  F:     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/
>  F:     Documentation/sound/soc/
>  F:     sound/soc/
> +F:     include/dt-bindings/sound/
>  F:     include/sound/soc*
>
>  SOUNDWIRE SUBSYSTEM
> --
> 2.19.1
>

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add ASoC maintainers for sound dt-bindings

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 843 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 12:45:34PM +0100, Clément Péron wrote:
> Gentle up,

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]