From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] uaccess: Add non-pagefault user-space read functions
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:01:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190226120159.c346704961ff22d344f45e96@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190225150603.GE32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi Peter,
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:06:03 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:05:41PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > +static __always_inline long __strncpy_from_unsafe_user(char *dst,
> > + const char __user *unsafe_addr, long count)
> > +{
> > + if (!access_ok(unsafe_addr, count))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + return strncpy_from_unsafe_common(dst, unsafe_addr, count);
> > +}
>
> Would something like so work for people?
>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 8 +++++++-
> include/linux/uaccess.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 780f2b42c8ef..3125d129d3b6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -92,12 +92,18 @@ static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, un
> * checks that the pointer is in the user space range - after calling
> * this function, memory access functions may still return -EFAULT.
> */
> -#define access_ok(addr, size) \
> +#define access_ok(addr, size) \
> ({ \
> WARN_ON_IN_IRQ(); \
> likely(!__range_not_ok(addr, size, user_addr_max())); \
> })
>
> +#define user_access_ok(addr, size) \
> +({ \
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS)); \
> + likely(!__range_not_ok(addr, size, user_addr_max())); \
> +})
> +
> /*
> * These are the main single-value transfer routines. They automatically
> * use the right size if we just have the right pointer type.
> diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> index 37b226e8df13..088f2ae09e14 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,24 @@
>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>
> +/**
> + * user_access_ok: Checks if a user space pointer is valid
> + * @addr: User space pointer to start of block to check
> + * @size: Size of block to check
> + *
> + * Context: User context or explicit set_fs(USER_DS).
> + *
> + * This function is very much like access_ok(), except it (may) have different
> + * context validation. In general we must be very careful when using this.
> + */
> +#ifndef user_access_ok
> +#define user_access_ok(addr, size) \
> +({ \
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS)); \
> + access_ok(addr, size); \
> +})
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Architectures should provide two primitives (raw_copy_{to,from}_user())
> * and get rid of their private instances of copy_{to,from}_user() and
Yeah, looks good to me.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-26 3:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-25 14:04 [RFC PATCH 0/4] tracing/probes: uaccess: Add support user-space access Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-25 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] uaccess: Make sure kernel_uaccess_faults_ok is updated before pagefault Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-25 14:05 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] uaccess: Add non-pagefault user-space read functions Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-25 15:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-25 17:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-25 18:16 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-02-26 4:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-26 12:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-26 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2] " Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-26 3:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2019-02-25 17:06 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] " Kees Cook
2019-02-26 4:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-25 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] tracing/probe: Add ustring type for user-space string Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-25 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] tracing/probe: Support user-space dereference Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-26 21:38 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] tracing/probes: uaccess: Add support user-space access Joel Fernandes
2019-02-27 7:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-27 8:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-27 11:39 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-27 21:33 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190226120159.c346704961ff22d344f45e96@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=changbin.du@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox